Elrod Posted August 28, 2013 Report Share Posted August 28, 2013 August 19, 2013 (USA TODAY) -- After admitting it targeted Tea Party groups for additional scrutiny in May, the Internal Revenue Service has been called on to explain its formerly obscure process for policing political activity by tax-exempt groups. http://accounting.smartpros.com/x75103.xml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Taxed Posted August 28, 2013 Report Share Posted August 28, 2013 I like the lawsuit filed by Rep. Chris Van Hollen to force IRS to use the "Exclusive purpose" language instead of the "Primary", that is the real cause of this problem 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcjenkins Posted August 29, 2013 Report Share Posted August 29, 2013 Yes, he's spotted one of the times, [i am sure there are others we just don't know about] when some bureaucrats have made an unlawful change in how they carry out their legal responsibility. I hope he's successful in the lawsuit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jainen Posted August 29, 2013 Report Share Posted August 29, 2013 >>some bureaucrats have made an unlawful change in how they carry out their legal responsibility<< Don't expect a slam dunk that the courts will agree with the plaintiff. The tax code is complicated, and half of it is written backwards. The Code itself says "exemption from taxation under subsection (a) shall be denied because a substantial part of the activities of such organization consists of carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation." Subsection (a) includes both 501( c)(3) and 501( c)(4) organizations, but only the ( c)(3)'s are named as subject to this denied exemption. IRS regs properly apply it to ( c)(4)'s as well. The Code itself does NOT refute that "promotion of social welfare" includes influencing legislation. It just makes a point to limit that function, which suggests that it would otherwise be allowable.. One possible outcome of this lawsuit is that ( c)(4)'s will have no limitation on political activity whatsoever! So be careful what you wish for--you just might get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Taxed Posted August 29, 2013 Report Share Posted August 29, 2013 >>> One possible outcome of this lawsuit is that ( c)(4)'s will have no limitation on political activity whatsoever! GOD HELP US IF THAT EVER HAPPENS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.