Jump to content
ATX Community

Unamortized Points - Rental Property


JohnH

Recommended Posts

This seems odd to me, but maybe I'm just not thinking clearly.  Client bought a rental property in 2010 and sold at a sizable loss in 2017.  We had been amortizing 11K in points paid when the property was originally purchased, so the unamortized points on a 30-year loan were down to about 8K.  My software shows the unamortized  points on Form 4797, Part I.  Part of me says "that's an odd place for them to show up", but the other part of me says "they have to go somewhere - may as well be there".  Does anyone think I should handle the points differently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.  After giving it some more thought, I suppose the 4797 is the logical place for the unamortized points to go.  

I think I was expecting them to show up on the Schedule E for some reason.  Probably because unamortized points on a home mortgage show up on the Schedule A (same form where the annual amortization deduction is taken). 

Anyhow, thanks to both of you for the replies.  Makes me more confident in accepting how the software handled it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Abby that the proper reporting is as he described. Points aren't part of basis, so I'd say that they don't belong on the 4797. The amortization of points is an expense that is deducted ratably over time, again not part of basis.  The law says that remaining unamortized points are to be deducted when the related loan terminates by events such as payoff, refi, foreclosure.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After sleeping on it, I went back and double checked everything this morning just to be sure I'm not missing anything. With a 6/17 sale date, my software (Drake), reports the pro-rata amount of current year points on the schedule E, but then reports the unamortized points on the 4797 with a zero selling price.  I'm not sure it makes a difference on this return because the client has large suspended losses and also a large capital loss on the property (even after adjusting basis for depreciation).  But if there were capital gains on the sale, it would matter whether the pints were on the Schedule E or the 4797. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jklcpa said:

I agree with Abby that the proper reporting is as he described. Points aren't part of basis, so I'd say that they don't belong on the 4797. The amortization of points is an expense that is deducted ratably over time, again not part of basis.  The law says that remaining unamortized points are to be deducted when the related loan terminates by events such as payoff, refi, foreclosure.

If that's the case, why has tax software been reporting the disposition of unamortized  stuff on the 4797 for years.

Never had a problem with doing it this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, cbslee said:

If that's the case, why has tax software been reporting the disposition of unamortized  stuff on the 4797 for years.

Never had a problem with doing it this way.

Well, I'm not a programmer but I'll take a wild guess that it is flowing there because it is an item listed on the depreciation schedule, however that doesn't make it the correct reporting.  All of the programs I've used over the years allow some flexibility by providing the preparer with check boxes to stop some items on the depreciation schedule from flowing to the wrong form, line, or section of a form, and will be labeled something like "do not include on 4797" or  "not sec 1245 property", etc.

If the loan was paid off in a transaction that was not part of the sale, we wouldn't even be having this discussion, and all should agree that the proper reporting would be to deduct the remaining unamortized balance on Sch E in the year of payoff.  This is no different except that the loan's payoff affected the final net cash due to/from the seller because it was included in the sale's settlement transaction.  

As I said before, it's an item that the law specifically says is NOT basis, nor is it an improvement or an expense of sale, so I see no justification for reporting it on the 4797.  And as John said, in some cases, it may make a difference on some returns.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...