Jump to content
ATX Community

AICPA & NAEA - Simplify W -4


Lee B

Recommended Posts

 

Copied from Tax Pro Today:

"The American Institute of CPAs is asking the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department to simplify the draft version of the Form W-4, the Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate, along with the accompanying instructions.

The AICPA’s comment letter comes as the National Association of Enrolled Agents has also criticized the draft Form W4 in a separate comment letter last week, saying it raises privacy concerns, creates a substantial risk of underwithholding, and requires taxpayers to forecast a number of tax-related items that are traditionally difficult to predict (see NAEA sees lots of problems with new Form W-4).

The AICPA raised some of the same issues in its own comment letter. “The AICPA recommends a simplified Form W-4 that reduces withholding in an appropriate and fair manner without placing undue burden and onus on taxpayers and their employers,” Annette Nellen, CPA, CGMA, Esq., chair of the AICPA Tax Executive Committee, wrote in the letter.

In regard to simplicity, Nellen suggested that Form W-4 should not include nonwage income, itemized and other deductions, tax credits, and total pay of all lower paying jobs (“personal information”). She described the draft form as “unduly complicated” and said it essentially requires taxpayers to calculate their tax liability.

“Taxpayers need a Form W-4 that is easy to understand and simple to complete, thereby reducing compliance burdens and minimizing the risk of tax underpayment and penalties,” Nellen wrote.

Nellen recommended the IRS and the Treasury Department develop a simplified Form W-4 that doesn’t request personal information. She pointed out that many employees would probably be hesitant to provide their employers with spousal and family income information on the Form W-4 as it could lead to unfair and discriminatory employment practices. However, if taxpayers don’t provide their other household income, deductions and credits, they could inadvertently face the risk of inaccurate and incomplete annual withholding calculations, which could then lead to underpayment of taxes and penalties, she wrote.

To prevent the shifting of unnecessary responsibilities and liability onto employers, the AICPA recommended the IRS and Treasury should give employers a straightforward method to determine their employees’ withholding.

“The Form W-4 has transformed from a long-standing form that was systematically distributed by employers to new employees as part of their initial onboarding process, to the current draft that employers need to calculate their employees’ withholdings on an annual basis,” Nellen wrote. “This form transition is a significant change and the risks and responsibility of accurate withholding calculations have shifted to employers."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could not agree more.

Here's simple for ya:

Every employee is withheld at Single 0. No W4 needed unless you want more or less withholding. W4 has one amount box with two checkboxes: Add this to my regular withholding and subtract this from my regular withholding.

On a second line, you can choose to bypass the regular withholding altogether and just enter a flat % you want withheld. This will be good for those whose wages vary significantly from week to week, or those working a second job, or those with with a spouse who earns much more than they do. The % could be less than 8%, or maybe 10%.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd make a separate W-4 for people who get large but irregular bonuses or commissions.  We've ALL seen clients usually in a 20% bracket have a huge bonus (that bracket-bumps them) that gets 20% withheld.  Then they get slammed in April.  I'd like folks to have the opportunity to increase % tax withheld on those big bonuses to 35% or 40%.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worst thing about the W-4 is yet to come next spring when taxpayers discover they have been underwithheld for 2018.  We will be flooded with questions from clients who will expect us to solve their tax problems by asking us to fill out this new monstrosity W-4 for them.  And then once we do that, the clients will blame us if the thing backfires.  The new W-4 is a typical government solution which doesn't solve anything but adds layers of confusion.

My solution to withholding is the same as it has been for the last several years.  Figure out how much shortage has been incurred, leave marital status & exemptions alone, and simply add the shortage (divided by periodicity of payroll) to the line that says "Additional withholding per pay period."

Some few of my clients have already tapped into the problem and have approached me.  For the time being, I have asked them to restore their pre-reduction withholding by using the "additional" line.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...