Jump to content
ATX Community

Sch C or Sch A?


Catherine

Recommended Posts

Client made a business deal with a friend; they were going to flip a house.  Friend bought the house, client gave personal loan for materials/supplies/etc for the flip.  Even got a real note, with real terms, notarized and everything.  "Friend" skips out with the money after making a couple of payments; house (in friend's name) foreclosed; almost the whole amount is lost.

So it looks like a plain-jane theft loss - but the 4684 for theft losses only flows to Sch A.  This was business only; agreement in place, proper documents, plan was to make a bundle on a flip.  Should I leave off the 4684 and just report it on Part V of Sch C?  I've been looking through instructions pubs and regs until I can't see straight and can find nothing specific to theft losses and Sch C.  It does not seem right to report on Sch A; it had nothing to do with personal items.

So the question is - am I right thinking this really belongs on Sch C?  Or am I stuck reporting on Sch A?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm. wouldn't this have originally been a de facto partnership?  If it was a business 'deal' and 'they' were going to flip a house, why would it be only your client's Sch. C?  I agree it doesn't seem appropriate for A as it was a business - sort of.  I'm guessing getting the SSN of the scoundrel is not going to be easy, though. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upon further reflection, I don't believe this meets the definition of a casualty loss.

Since your client is not in the business of loaning money, it also doesn't meet the requirements for the deduction of a business bad debt.

I believe that the only deduction it qualifies for is a capital loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the documents and agreements include the business setup and agreement to share in profits, losses, and expenses, or was the documentation you refer to the loan agreement only.  I'm trying to determine if it really was a de facto partnership or a joint venture, either of those requiring a return for the business.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catherine said:

Client made a business deal with a friend; they were going to flip a house.  Friend bought the house, client gave personal loan for materials/supplies/etc for the flip.  Even got a real note, with real terms, notarized and everything.  "Friend" skips out with the money after making a couple of payments; house (in friend's name) foreclosed; almost the whole amount is lost.

So it looks like a plain-jane theft loss - but the 4684 for theft losses only flows to Sch A.  This was business only; agreement in place, proper documents, plan was to make a bundle on a flip.  Should I leave off the 4684 and just report it on Part V of Sch C?  I've been looking through instructions pubs and regs until I can't see straight and can find nothing specific to theft losses and Sch C.  It does not seem right to report on Sch A; it had nothing to do with personal items.

So the question is - am I right thinking this really belongs on Sch C?  Or am I stuck reporting on Sch A?

Show this to your client:  https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/theft-by-conversion.html

He can file a police report and make his friend a wanted person, this will get his attention.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking into other documentation.  From what I can tell, it was a loose partnership.  One was going to buy the house, the other do most of the renovations and put in funds because the first had wholesale connections for supplies.  Yeah.  And we'll never get the other's ssn.

Year is 2016; before the tax law changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you have given enough info to answer your question.  However, I don't think you can call it a theft loss, it sounds more like a bad debt.  If so, the question becomes whether it is  bad dept from business  (write off 100% as ordinary loss) or personal (treated as short term capital loss).

Section 166 basically says that a business debt is one created or acquired in connection with a taxpayers business,: or incurred within a trade or business.  It depends on facts and circumstances as case law tells us.  For example, there was a case where a CPA incurred a business debt when he loaned money to a start up business with the expectation of providing professional services to the business.

So in the case of your client, if he can show it was connected to a trade or business he gets a free pass to write it off as an ordinary loss. However, there is another possible twist since you mentioned a partnership.

There are cases where the courts have treated loans as a capital contribution in exchange for a percentage of profits.  If that was the case, then the loss becomes deductible under section 165.  So then the question is whether the house flipping venture was going to be treated as a business or an investment in determining whether an ordinary loss or capital loss was incurred.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...