Jump to content
ATX Community

Insurance


BLACK BART

Recommended Posts

Without mentioning the dreaded O-word, does anyone know IF we will have to be concerned whatsoever in any shape, form, or manner whether anyone did/did not have insurance this year?  I know the penalty's gone, but are we finally through with the mess (except for 8962 under-over payment cases which I will REFUSE to do) and can I drop this 10 lb. stack of related data/junk in the garbage can once and for all? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The requirement to issue Form 1095 has not gone away. I know I will be  hard at work in late January preparing 1095s for my largest client who is an ALA.

In fact there were a number of articles mid summer about the IRS making it a point to pursue and assess penalties on employers who are not issuing 1095s.

Also you will still be dealing with the issue of Premium Tax Credit overpayments and/or related refunds.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, cbslee said:

The requirement to issue Form 1095 has not gone away. I know I will be  hard at work in late January preparing 1095s for my largest client who is an ALA.

In fact there were a number of articles mid summer about the IRS making it a point to pursue and assess penalties on employers who are not issuing 1095s.

Also you will still be dealing with the issue of Premium Tax Credit overpayments and/or related refunds.

 

Ok, thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, cbslee said:

The requirement to issue Form 1095 has not gone away. I know I will be  hard at work in late January preparing 1095s for my largest client who is an ALA.

In fact there were a number of articles mid summer about the IRS making it a point to pursue and assess penalties on employers who are not issuing 1095s.

Also you will still be dealing with the issue of Premium Tax Credit overpayments and/or related refunds.

 

I know employers still have to make 1095s and I know some people still buying O-insurance have to settle up with  IRS for the over & under payments, but what I'm getting at is this: do WE still have to do anything else (make any marks anywhere on a tax return) if we aren't the unfortunate souls preparing those 8962s? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, thanks Deb (and you too CBS) for that; I'm aware that several states are continuing on with the penalty (AR is not), but I was mainly interested in the IRS portion of it.   Don't know if you use ATX, but last year inside their 1040 "information input" we had to check a box indicating if clients had insurance for the year.  Of course (penaltywise) that wouldn't be necessary this time, but wondered if they would be asking us again to maybe check up on their 8962 clients.  Also since the penalty was killed off, but not O-care itself, are WE finally (except for 8962s) cut loose from the thing.

P.S. Good point about the 1095s Randall.  I have used those as backup for the credits too.

P.P.S.  to Judy -  I haven't seen the 2019 draft yet, but the 2018 didn't have a checkbox on the FORM either.  However, there WAS a checkbox inside the ATX "info input" section.  Thanks for the input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BLACK BART said:

P.P.S.  to Judy -  I haven't seen the 2019 draft yet, but the 2018 didn't have a checkbox on the FORM either.  However, there WAS a checkbox inside the ATX "info input" section.  Thanks for the input.

The checkbox on the 2018 form was on the righthand side directly below the spouse's SSN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jklcpa said:

The checkbox on the 2018 form was on the righthand side directly below the spouse's SSN.

You're right - I missed it.  But didn't forget the main part - line 61 on 1040's schedule four.  Didn't hear any squawks back though (only had 3 or 4), so I guess as long as they sent the money all was okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have also used the 1095s as documentation for the credits and listed them on the 8867.  Then a divorced preparer brought to my attention that carrying the insurance does not prove the child lives with you.  His children did not live with him but he had to insure them according to the divorce decree.  While the 1095 sent to him listed them as having full year coverage, it obviously did not prove their address.  Using the form made it easy for us in that we didn't have to ask the clients to scramble for additional proof, but when you think about it we were wrong.  Oops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SaraEA said:

I have also used the 1095s as documentation for the credits...but when you think about it we were wrong.  Oops.

Oops, indeed! :rolleyes: Don't know what our line of thinking there was - maybe "If he's insuring them, he surely must have them." But you're absolutely right; all that did was prove he had insurance on everybody.  I had a few divorce cases like that, but he could've been in Miami and the rugrats could've been in Nome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, jklcpa said:

If you want to take a look, Google "2019 draft 1040" and look for the link to IRS site. I'm on a tablet right now and can't post a link because the web address automatically goes to a download the draft form as a pdf.

Okay, thanks.  I don't see the box anywhere, so maybe we're home free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the Shared Responsibility Payment is zero for 2019, not gone.  I am telling my clients there is a difference between setting the penalty at zero and the SRP being gone.  I can see it being a positive number again, and guess who will get blamed when they have to pay a penalty again?  "But you told me..." 

Yes, and I know you always listen to me and would have bought insurance if you had only known.  Right.  Nice try.  /s

I'm advising clients to research (call me) before they make decisions if the SRP is a factor in their decision making.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, RitaB said:

I believe the Shared Responsibility Payment is zero for 2019, not gone

Congress effectively eliminated the penalty by setting it to zero.   

2017 was the only year IRS could fully enforce it.

******************************************************

Sec. 11081. ELIMINATION OF SHARED RESPONSIBILITY PAYMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS FAILING TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.

(a) IN GENERAL. Section 5000A(c) is amended—

(1) IRC in paragraph (2)(B)(iii), by striking “2.5 percent” and inserting “Zero percent”, and

(2) in paragraph (3)—

(A) by striking “$695” in subparagraph (A) and inserting “$0”, and

(B) IRC by striking subparagraph (D).

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. The amendments made by this section shall apply to months beginning after December 31, 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...