Jump to content
ATX Community

NEW RENTAL QUESTION


Lee B

Recommended Posts

I have a client who has a total of 9 rental properties, 2 which were purchased during 2020.

One, an older house was purchased in early July. The prepurchase Inspection Report had a laundry list of repair & maintenance

items that were needed, none of which constituted a leasehold improvement, which cost $11,700 and several months to complete.

The house was advertised for rent in September, but was not rented for several months.

Total 2020 rent for this house was only $1,558 and other deductible expenses totaled $ 5,682.

Would you go ahead and deduct the $ 11,700 as R & M.

Note: the other properties generate enough taxable income to easily cover this potential loss,

therefore passive loss limitations are not in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per IRC Sec. 195 upto 5K of "business startup costs" can be deducted; amounts exceeding that must be amortized over 15 years as Sec. 197 intangibles (ignoring the 50K cap on startup costs), beginning the month in which the business begins.  But for no business having yet begun startup costs otherwise would have been deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses.
Also, per Rev. Rul. 81-150, expenditures that otherwise would have been capitalized such as those in constructing a capital asset, are not startup costs.
Based on the client's assertion that the 11.7K were 'mere' repairs and maintenance I wouldn't saddle the business with a depreciable-lived definition but take the 5K deduction and amortize 6.7K over 15 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, since this was a new purchase and had to have significant 'things' done to prepare to place into service, the expenses should be capitalized.  I look to the Tangible Property Regulations Reg. section 1.263(a)-3.  The AICPA put out a Quick Summary of Final Tangible Property Regulations a few years ago and RSM Consulting has some nice decision trees to help. https://rsmus.com/what-we-do/services/tax/new-flowcharts-provide-clarity-on-the-final-tangible-property-re.html

When I look at both of these given the OP's description, I come down on capitalization.  YMMV.  I did not look at the definition of Leasehold Improvements because the description did not say the property was leased, rather a purchase.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for all of the useful input. I did say in my original post that none of the the work appeared to be a Leasehold Improvement.

However, when the property was purchased the house was definitely not in condition to be rented.

There were a number of electrical and plumbing code violations that had to be fixed, plus other cosmetic fixes to things that just looked ugly.

In addition all of this R & M had to be done before the property could be placed in service, therefore I have decided to capitalize the $ 11,700.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...