Jump to content
ATX Community

KEYWEST_RICKS

Members
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KEYWEST_RICKS

  1. has anyone seen a refund yet from someone who was paying back the 1/15th of the first time homebuyers credit?

    client called this am to say she saw on the news that irs is saying those people who filed will have to file an amended return to get their refund?? i have seen nothing on the news irs web site etc about this.

    has anyone seen a refund yet? or seen anything about having to amend the return??

    thanks

    jeff

  2. This is a huge pain!! have a very understanding client but... she is due a monster refund that she is used to getting the first week of feb. So what does anyone have a plan of action if this goes two more weeks?? i know the whole "hey there is nothing i can do about it i just send it in and the irs is processing" but this person is really in bad shape because of this and i cant just tell her she will get it when she gets it

    jeff

  3. I told the client that the refund would PROBABLY be in her account on friday 2/25... she calls me on fri and says its not there. we look on the irs web site and it says will be deposited on 3/1. today still no refund in her account. If i call the 800 number for wheres my refund it still says will be refunded 3/1/11.... however the web site now says no information is avail on the refund and to wait one week to check back. of course client is used to getting refund in late jan..... had to wait until 2/14 to file this year....now this. they are being very understanding about it but also very anxious.

    anyone else had a situation like this ???

  4. ok, i know that police or fire can designate a part of the retirement for insurance and it is not taxable. however, i have someone who brought me a 1099 r from his company that he retired from. also has a break down of the benefits and part is listed as supplemntal.... he says that is to reimburse him for the medicare supplement he has to purchase and that it is not taxable to him. I have not ever heard this but i learn something new every day. anyone else agree with him on this???

  5. off topic a bit but am i the only one that cringes whenever i hear something like this? The state medicaid program is there to make sure her medical bills are paid if she is unable to pay them... not ensure that her son gets something from her when she passes. seems like total welfare fraud to me. If we changed this and said mom put her paycheck in her sons name so that she could qualify for food stamps... we would all be upset and think this unethical! but it seems that many attnys do this all the time.

  6. >>I don't know of any way you can dodge SE taxes <<

    I know. I got confused. I did go back and try to change my answer, but Booger had already quoted me. Then I thought about pretending I was only talking about limited partners, but obviously nobody would fall for that line.

    March 16, 2010....4:40 pm.... Jainen actually maybe almost.... well... i am sure he didnt. Actually maybe say he was wrong?!?!? it couldnt be could it?? Jainen for sure my hero on this board though

  7. Have an employee who filed a complaint. no merit to the claim. they were just disgruntled employee. now i understand how these things can go really bad even if the facts are in your favor. however, my question is that we received a form asking us if we wanted to go through mediation on this. Have any of you out there been through this process? everything i read says to not just dismiss mediation out of hand.

    anyone with any comments on this?

    thanks

  8. What about just waiting until after the extension date -- say, October 24th? At that point, they will -not- accept e-files and will have to take paper -- or add in some system for e-filing prior-year returns.

    I also have a couple of clients (in IT) who refuse to e-file returns (one won't even log in to a bank account, and will barely use an ATM machine).

    They'll have to make -some- provision for those who have complex returns but won't e-file.

    Indiana went to a requirement to e file a couple of years ago but they do have a way that the taxpayer can elect out. I havent had to worry about it but i would hope that the feds would also have something like this

  9. I am guessing the problem lies on how you did the transfer from the old computer to new computer. I am guessing there are missing files that were not copied.

    I transferred all my programs from atx 2001 through axt2007 last year without any problems or reloading of cds by using Laplink PCmover. However, laplink pcmover did cost $40 but it was well worth it! Every old program worked!

    Good luck

    Can you tell me if laplink worked moving from an xp machine to a vista machine?? or does it really matter??

    thanks

    jeff

  10. Had a DOL agent tell me a few years ago it is the job of the employer to supervise the employee. this includes regulating the amount of hours worked. if the card says 50 then its 50. even though the employer only wanted him to work 42. it is up to the supervisor to make sure that if its 42 you want its 42 you get.

    not paying what is on the time card, i believe, is a good way to get into trouble with DOL. under an examination you are going to try to prove that you included all hours worked in the pay of the employee.. well his records say 50 hours ..... what records do you have to say he only worked 42??

    jeff

  11. Someone had expenses for utilities, rent, supplies etc to open a schedule c business before the doors actually opened. problem with license and zoning and the business never opened. not a corp or llc but a sole prop. What are those costs?? Pre Open would have been cap. and then amortized or deducted. do you say on sch c still or as a capital loss subject to 3000 limit on sch d?

    thanks

    jeff

  12. for everyone who thinks this is undoubtably a bad idea for the taxpayer to take the credit, please send me $7,500 and i will pay you back interest free over the next 15 yrs. please put me in this terrible situation!

    i had a banker advise one of my clients that this was a bad credit to take. i told them to go back and ask the banker if they would loan them $7,500 interest free for 15 yrs???

    for many people this will simply mean that there refund will go from $2000 to $1500. why not use that money to reduce the amount of the mortgage on the house? @ 5.25% you would be saving $390 per year in interest expense. almost enough to offset the payback amount.

    if i can take an interest free loan to pay down someone who is charging me interest... i do that any day.

    jeff

  13. just wanting to double check with someone else on this. Got a new client from a friend. this is a c corp. has large income this year after having little or no income in the past. had a large nol that last year was the 15th year for carryforward. I believe that large nol has expired and they are unable to use it against income for 2008. agreed?

    thanks

    jeff

  14. >>Give it to everyone if that's the purpose<<

    Okay, that was last year's stimulus.

    I really don't understand the criticism of EIC recipients, especially from tax professionals. If you don't enjoy working with the tax code, why are you even in this business? Criticize Congress if you disagree with the widespread policy of using the tax code for economic incentives, but there is NOTHING wrong with individuals filing for benefits they are legally entitled to. IRC Section 32 has no greater moral significance than Section 179 or any other credit or deduction that Congress has authorized.

    EIC is not tax code. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is a duck...EIC is welfare not tax code. Section 179 is a deduction for money spent. EIC is payment to people as welfare. I see a big difference. most every other credit requires someone to spend money on something to recieve the tax benefit.

×
×
  • Create New...