Jump to content
ATX Community

1120S $0 basis loan repaid


JerryH

Recommended Posts

JerryH - I am having difficulty figuring why tp would have to report repayment of loan at all.

Maybe interest. Better minds than ours will set us straight!

If s-corp had prior losses, then loan basis could have been used to be able to deduct losses. Now that loan is being repaid, it would probably be treated as capital gain, same as an excess distribution - treated as a deemed sale of stock. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>treated as a deemed sale of stock<<

I agree with MJG if the loan amount was used to deduct losses below the taxpayers basis and the basis has not been restored with profits or contributions. You have to do a tax basis analysis from the individuals holding and not from the S-corp books. It could be the losses at the shareholder level were not actually deducted and as such were carried forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ordinary per this ruling, just can't find where they want it reported. Tp used the loan to get the loss in a prior year then got his $ back in following year. Loan was only for about 2 weeks. Thanks for replys. JerryH

IRS Revenue Rulings

Code Sec. 1376

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26 CFR 1.1376-1: Adjustment to basis of stock of, and indebtedness to, shareholders; increase in basis of stock.

A shareholder-creditor of a small business corporation derives ordinary income from the repayment of a loan made on open account to the extent that the repayments exceed his basis in the loan.

REV. RUL. 68-537

An electing small business corporation, as defined in section 1371 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, repaid to one of its shareholders a loan made on open account. The shareholder's basis in the loan was reduced by the amount by which his share of the corporation net operating loss exceeded his basis in the corporation's stock.

Held, the installments received by the shareholder in retirement of the loan must be allocated in part to a return of his basis in the loan and in part to income, but the income is ordinary income and not income from the exchange of a capital asset. See Joe M. Smith and Florence P. Smith et al v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 872 (1967).

The situation here involved is distinguishable from that in Revenue Ruling 64-162, C.B. 1964-1 (Part 1), 304, since in that Revenue Ruling the corporation had issued its shareholder a note as an evidence of the indebtedness and such note was a capital asset in the hands of the shareholder.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© 2008 CCH. All Rights Reserved.

CCH® Master Tax Guide

Top Federal Tax Issues for 2008

1040 Express Answers

1041 Express Answers

1065 Express Answers

1120S Express Answers

Business Quick Answers

All States Quick Answers

Find it Fast

Kleinrock's Compliance Guide 1040

Kleinrock's Compliance Guide 706, 709, 1041, 1120, 1120S, 1065

Kleinrock's 1040

Kleinrock's Payroll Tax

Kleinrock's 990

Federal Daily Tax Bulletin

Federal Daily Tax Bulletin Archive

Federal Tax Bulletin Back Issues

Employment Tax Briefing

Employment Tax Briefing Archive

California Tax Bulletin

New York Tax Bulletin

Kleinrock CPE

Annual Review CPE

Federal TaxExpert®

All States TaxExpert

Employment TaxExpert®

Federal Archive Library

State Archive Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...