Jump to content
ATX Community

Rental Depr Question


Terry D EA

Recommended Posts

Client had rental property that I began depreciating back in 2011. The property was rented until he got divorced in 2016 and moved into the property. Client is now remarried and began renting the same property in 2022. Numerous capital improvements. Is my thinking correct. Start the depreciation for TY 2022 using the original cost plus capital improvements, minus accumulated depreciation to arrive at the now depreciable basis. Is this correct or am I missing something? Start with 27.5 years or use the remaining years left? Thanks!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Terry D EA said:

Start with 27.5 years or use the remaining years left?

 

I don’t think there is any authoritative answer to your question, but I believe you should pick up where you left off in the past; including cost and accumulated depreciation.  That way you will have a record of accumulated depreciation if the property is sold in the future.

 

By using the remaining depreciation life, your client will receive a larger deduction per year than if you start over with 27.5 years.

 

As for as the improvements go, I would list them separately and begin depreciation on the date the house was put back in service as a rental.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I recall, I would think the depreciable basis would be the lesser of the adjusted basis in the house (cost + improvements - previous depreciation) or the fair market value at the time placed in service.  Not sure about the depreciable life.  My guess would be that would also start over if FMV is less than adjusted basis. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Gail in Virginia said:

From what I recall, I would think the depreciable basis would be the lesser of the adjusted basis in the house (cost + improvements - previous depreciation) or the fair market value

 

 

From what I understand, that rule applies if the property was not previously used in a trade or business.

 

Per reg 1.167(g)-1 

In the case of property which has not been used in the trade or business or held for the production of income and which is thereafter converted to such use, the fair market value on the date of such conversion, if less than the adjusted basis of the property at that time, is the basis for computing depreciation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case, the improvements were not previously used in trade or business, and would have to be depreciated based on the FMV, would they not?  And would that FMV be determined by how much they increased or decreased the value of the house since, I assume, they are an integral part of the house and not stand alone improvements? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...