Tax Bird Posted August 1, 2007 Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 I'm wondering, if a person works for the same employer all year but in multiple States for varying durations, how do they file for unemployment? Seems to me a person files in their home State. If that's the case then does the employer have to pay into UI for the resident State of their employee as well as the work State (as a general rule)? Seems impractical to me but that may be the way it is. I'm wondering if anyone here has some insight they could share? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldJack Posted August 1, 2007 Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 Both states will collect unemployment tax based upon the wages paid in their state. As a result, I don't think you are allowed to draw benefits from both states at the same time, but you are NOT limited to only drawing from your state of residence. I believe the application to draw asks if you are receiving from any other state. I think you have to qualify for the benefits from whichever state you choose to apply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacun Posted August 1, 2007 Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 The first state you start milking is the one with more money on your unemployment account. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tax Bird Posted August 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 Both states will collect unemployment tax based upon the wages paid in their state. As a result, I don't think you are allowed to draw benefits from both states at the same time, but you are NOT limited to only drawing from your state of residence. I believe the application to draw asks if you are receiving from any other state. I think you have to qualify for the benefits from whichever state you choose to apply. This is what I suspected. So for the employer who has jobs in multiple States, conceivably they will pay much more in UI than if they just stayed put in one State. Meaning, the U.I ceiling would never be reached with one State but will be exceeded cumulatively when combined. *Ugh* I hope I'm wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tax Bird Posted August 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 Woo Hoo! I found a lovely document on the US DOL website the Interstate Reciprocal Coverage Agreement to which all States have signed except MN. The DOL website is so handy, I will post the entire link! http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/laws.asp Eh! But I can't access the document without a password. Poop! If I find a way to get the complete doc I'll post it here. In the meantime, the agreement allows for payment of UI into only one State per employee. In other words, the wages earned in one State *do* count for wages earned in another State so that they do not have to reach each wage base individually in each State. Halleluia! (Cue the choir...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tax Bird Posted August 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 Ok. the doc I found on the DOL contains all interstate agreements, including the IRCA. If I did this right, you should find the doc attached.DOL_InterState_Agreements.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldJack Posted August 1, 2007 Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 You want to give us a clue as to what page number you refer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tax Bird Posted August 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 You want to give us a clue as to what page number you refer? p. B-8 is where the IRCA begins. Sorry about that! I could've sworn we worked together on the Jackie Stallone Psychic hotline. Maybe it was another 'OldJack'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldJack Posted August 1, 2007 Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 p. B-8 is where the IRCA begins. All I see is the states agreeing as to paying benefits. I don't see anything about the worker's business paying contributions. But then I only scanned through all that nonsense wording. Another OldJack? Not likely! :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tax Bird Posted August 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2007 All I see is the states agreeing as to paying benefits. I don't see anything about the worker's business paying contributions. But then I only scanned through all that nonsense wording. Starting on B-8 it says, in part "...The purpose of this plan shall be to provide for coverage under the unemployment compensation law of one State of services performed by an individual for a single employing unit..." Another OldJack? Not likely! So it WAS you! Why didn't you read my mind then? Humph! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.