Jump to content
ATX Community

Lee B

Donors
  • Posts

    5,275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    297

Posts posted by Lee B

  1. There is supposed to be a small 12.12 update in the next few days, which going to bring back the K-1 import,

    plus fix a timing out problem with large efiles and take care a couple of minor print manager issues.

    Now they have added miscellaneous stability and performance improvements.

  2. I am on an XP standalone. Tuesday evening I updated to 12.11, even though I was running pretty smoothly on 12.10.

    After the update, it took forever to open the program the first time. After that everything was 40 to 60 % slower,

    except the forms loading in the Print Manager which was more twice as slow (Over 2 minutes).

    I hadn't updated to the suggested file exclusions since I was running OK speedwise.

    So I updated to the suggested file exclusions in both Microsoft Security Essentials and Windows Firewall

    and my slowness mostly went away. I'm back to the speed I had under 12.10.

  3. ATX admitted yesterday, that a Schedule E Form update was messed up.

    It's supposed to be fixed with a temporary patch today or tomorrow via a form update.

    Then a permanent fix will happen with the 12.13 update. As the stomach turns !

  4. 1. There are some workarounds that I remember seeing on the ATX board, that involve renaming some files.

    Basically the program seems to have lost track of where the fixed assts are located.

    2. Another approach is to restore the return. First go to your return manager to the restore command and see if this client shows up in the list of clents that are available to be restored. If it shows up, delete the return in the return manager.

    Go to the restore command and restore the client. I wouldn't select the most recent backup,

    since it may be corrupted.

    Update 12.11 was supposed fix this problem, but the posts I've seen On the ATX board don't sound promising.

    ATX had a procedure for bringing back lost assets that you were supposed to follow after updating to 12.11.

    The procedure was included or appended to the 12.11 instructions

    Good Luck,

  5. OK, I figured it out. I found a knowledgebase article that pointed me in the right direction.

    The original folder is called "Backup" I created a new folder called "BackupII"

    In preferences, I pointed the automatic backup to the new folder. That in itself did not fix the problem.

    Closed the program. Opened the program. Under Returns, I selected Backup, picked the new folder, selected all the clients

    in my Return Manager and ran a Manual Backup. Rechecked the Restore function selecting the new folder, and everything is there,

    with the exception of any previously deleted clients, which are in the original folder "Backup"

    Now from time to time, I'll check the new folder to make sure current returns I'm working on are getting updated.

    If they're not, I guess I will create create another folder etc.

    I've done some further checking and right now it seems to working

  6. Several IT people have posted on the ATX board that the ATX backup this year is unreliable and buggy.

    This got me thinking, so I checked my restore function:

    1. There are 4 more clients listed in my restore function, than in my return manager, hopefully they are all

    clients that I deleted in my return manager .

    2. More troubling is that 9 of the returns in my restore function do not display a name, however

    they still seem to be listed in alpha order. I opened a return that I just completed, saved it

    and went back to my restore function, where the name of the return doesn't display.

    However it seems to be in the list of clients in the spot in the alpha order where it should be

    with the time on the backup file that matches the save that I just did.

    3. If anyone has any ideas about how I can get a clients name to display in the restore function?

  7. Jack,

    I hope this helps you.

    Re: Can we go backwards
    My experience has been this: 1. You must uninstall the software using the "Uninstall" feature on the ATX Install Disk. You will NOT have good results if you attempt to uninstall using the operating system (Windows) uninstall feature.
    2. You must then reinstall the software using the original installation disk. You will need your install codes.
    3. You may then update to the version that suits your fancy. (Assumes you have retained that version of the update.) These are available somewhere, but I can't recall where I found them.)
    Warning: If these steps are unclear or confusing, do not attempt this procedure
    Re: Can we go backwards
    Looks like you can download prior updates with the following link:

    http://download.cchsfs.com/tech/atx/atx2012.update.12.xx.exe

    substitute the update number for the xx

    I just downloaded the 12.10 update this way.
  8. I just finished browsing the ATX board:

    1. For a significant number of posters that were having problems before,they now have worse problems

    and are scrambling trying to figure out how to go back to 12.10 (They seem to be primarily on Networks)

    2. Some posters on standalones say, It's about the same or somewhat slower. (Almost no one is saying it's faster)

    3. A number of posters are saying that it did not fix the fixed asset problems.

    Posters that watched Ben on ATX TV are saying it's like ATX has thrown in the towel as far as fixing bugs or improving speed.

    Ben's big emphasis was about ATX doing what they could to help everyone file their extensions.

    And so it goes. I'm glad it's cloudy today. It's really hard to do tax returns when it's nice and sunny!

    • Like 1
  9. Early Feedback on the ATX board is to put it politely, less than positive.

    Since, I am running fairly troublefree just a bit slower, I think I will hold off for a few days and let the dust settle.

  10. Several posters on the ATX board discovered that their network was being slowed down because

    not all of the components met 1gigabit standards, some were still 10/100. I copied this post:

    Re: Double your Speed (Network only)
    Gigabit networks have been the standard for over a decade. You guys should really hire an expert to setup your networks. I assume you don't have the Domino's guy prepare your tax returns.

    In summary, to Achieve Gigabit speeds, you need:

    -Gigabit Switch;
    -Cat 5e or Cat 6 (preferred) ethernet cabling in your office properly connected;
    -Gigabit network interface card for the "server" and
    -Gigabit network interface card for the workstation(s)

    Note: Network interface cards (NIC) are either built into your motherboard or are a card inside your computer. Some are not Gigabit. You can buy a Gigabit network interface card if the one on your motherboard is not Gigabit. They are inexpensive. You need to determine if your motherboard supports a PCI card or a PCI Express Card (preferred).
×
×
  • Create New...