Jump to content
ATX Community

Medlin Software, Dennis

Donors
  • Posts

    1,664
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62

Posts posted by Medlin Software, Dennis

  1. So many believe they do better not paying RC and payroll taxes, versus a good long healthy contribution to SS...  While it does not come up often among my customers, I have yet to hear from one who was doing better with their investments over SS, as many seem to skirt RC.  I share this as often as I can.  In the last couple of decades (maybe longer?), SS is still a better "deal" for the average person.  What often gets overlooked is coverage for non working spouses, disability, survivor benes, and how a disabled child/adult can transition from SSI to SSDI when a parent claims SS (or on death).  I have a huge bias - to be clear.  My grandmother collected well from SS for 50 years.  I was a survivor bene recipient.  I have a non working spouse.  I have a disabled child/adult - who will likely draw SSDI from my record for 30-40 years (a significant "raise" from SSI, and with no means test).

    • Like 1
  2. G2R’s quote actually has the answer for RC. “Remuneration”. This means they insurance counts towards RC since is is money received because of employment. Remuneration is the term to stand on, and their definition is favorable.

    back when we got our first mortgage I was an employee only. The lender said we did not have enough income. “Suddenly” I had a new stub with no Section 125 (health insurance) and that same amount added to taxable wages. I also had a letter from employer stating I declined Section 125 going forward. Silly exercise, but it worked. 

  3. 11 hours ago, Lion EA said:

    So, HI in Box 1 does NOT help an employee/shareholder meet RC, because no SS/Medicare is being paid on HI.

    Depends on who is asking and how the owner/employee replies.

    Mortgage lender, does not likely count Section 125 or S corp insurance. Other lenders, make them define what they are asking for and they may ask for Box 1 earnings.

    I push to include health premiums as pay. I am going to have insurance, pre tax or not, so why should I be punished (lower countable pay) just because I can avoid taxes on the premiums.

    For those trying to just meet RC, this is a real issue to ponder since their premiums could be 20k plus (family).

  4. Windows Task Manager is also a fair way to see what is running.

    History and fact. Most of the issues with preloading and startup are user caused. What I mean is devs are inclined to preload to lower customer complaints about software startup speed. Same reason we (computer users) still, since Windows 3.1, have issues with lost data from power interruptions (disk caching enabled). Disk caching is when the OS loads memory with what it thinks can be safely handled later.  Exactly like a child promising to get chores done now, when the child really means they will try to get them done before they get caught.

    Then, add in networking, and you get unexpected delays from another machine, and just plain delays from the OS checking and waiting to see if other machines are connected, and complication exponentially grows. 

    • Like 2
  5. I think GM had met the volume restrictions and was ineligible. Jan 1, 2023 the volume restriction went away. Currently, we are in a time/loophole window while the battery restrictions are being developed and published  

    Written as I smile while waiting to pickup  our new Tesla. The 9500 total (fed and state) credit /rebate was too much to ignore. 

  6. 1 hour ago, cbslee said:

    While the IRS pronouncement may make practical sense, it's logical basis under tax law is questionable.

    IRS and logical in the same sentence...  Not good to see/read while eating!

    Feb 14, and I am still dealing with folks who do not understand that 0 withholding can be proper, than there was a HUGE adjustment to the withholding brackets for 2023, and the prior W4 "change" is still biting many employees.

    • Like 3
  7. Since you did not say he gives all deposits from the December statement from his separate business account, and all cash/checks/cards go through said separate business account... (you likely know where I am going).

    I do not miss shoe box accounting, writing checks, or using cash (for business).  Long live charge cards with rewards and their detailed monthly statements!

  8. 1 minute ago, JohnH said:

    The more difficult part relates to what happens if the employer isn't pleased that the taxpayer opened this can of worms, as Medlin pointed out.  That's probably my greatest concern in this entire matter.  I'm thinking of declining the work based on that consideration alone.  

    In this specific case, since the employer is in MA, probable more delicate than difficult.  I suspect an oversight, maybe belief the pandemic rules were still in place, maybe new payroll person.  Normally, I would pass.  But this case, I would share the options with the potential client and let them adult.  If they want to do it right, I would take it on.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  9. 3 minutes ago, cbslee said:

    How do you file a NC return with less wages than shown on the W 2?

    So are you going to have your client ask his employer to amend his W 2?

     

    That’s the rub we have gone over here more than once. In this case, ot may be an oversight since the employer is based in MA. 

    • Thanks 1
  10. It is the reverse of the usual. The usual is an employee not providing accurate work location.

    indeed, the employee should file their return properly.

    the employee must carefully consider the ramifications of enlightening the employer. But, it may just be an oversight since the employer likely already has MA payroll nexus.

    Another case of lifetime employment (dealing with these things) as there is zero chance all states will agree to any common sense rules for mobile employees. My usual advice is to assume each state taxes for one millisecond or all of them (in state) unless there is an exception. Even this can be sketchy in the case where more than one entity wants a bite.

    • Thanks 1
  11. Both states will want personal and business income tax, as much as they can get.

    likely the employer did not consider the ramifications first, so it may require much back digging to apportion.

    The recent discussion on MTC’s suggestions for modern take on 86-272 is going to be a long lasting nightmare. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  12. While is should go without saying, if there is any even .000001% of an opening to share appropriately, strongly suggesting getting a qualified probate attorney involved.  They can expedite things (court filings) and their fee will be sell spent money.  I've now done more intestate estates than most non-lawyers do (3), and they were each very complicated.  I still would not do so on my own.  Most are "scared" of the cost.  The cost in most/all? states, is et by statue, essentially the same amount the admin is eligible to be paid.

  13. Wait. Is stinks for those left behind, but thems the rules.

    Once appointed, then they can start acting. Until then, the estate must just wait unless there was something setup in advance. I had to go through this as the admin. Waiting for the appointment was a huge liability as there was property being squatted on which was uninsured. But waiting was the only option.

    Remember, in restate means any interested party can file for admin, depending on state law. 

  14. I tried it to see what it generates with a personalized question. It was incorrect, I absolutely disavow having created a certain well known software which FTX is said to have used :).

    One thing for sure, it de personalized, even more if possible, anything you randomly read on the internet.  There are folks already showing how to use AI to generate blog and other similar posts..... for SEO purposes.  What is old is new again (stuffing the web with info to get clicks.)  This time, it is a tool with regurgitates what it has already found online, and tries to reword it.  I help found a software company, but not the one the AI says I did...

×
×
  • Create New...