NT Urge FTC To Block Pending Facebook Privacy Changes

[kcjenkins]

A coalition of six consumer privacy groups is calling on the Federal Trade Commission to enforce an earlier consent order with Facebook and block proposed changes in the social network’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities and its Data Use Policy because the proposed changes violate the 2011 settlement with the Commission.

“The changes will allow Facebook to routinely use the images and names of Facebook users for commercial advertising without consent,” the groups said. “The changes violate Facebook’s current policies and the 2011 Facebook settlement with the FTC. The Commission must act to enforce its order.”

Signing the letter were Consumer Watchdog, the Electronic Privacy Information (EPIC), the Center for Digital Democracy, Patient Privacy Rights, U.S. PIRG, and Privacy Rights Clearing House.

Read a copy of the letter here: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/ltrfacebookftc090413.pdf

“Facebook has long played fast and loose with users’ data and relied on complex privacy settings to confuse its users, but these proposed changes go well beyond that,” said John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy director. “Facebook’s overreach violates the FTC Consent Order that was put in place after the last major privacy violation; if the Commission is to retain any of its credibility, it must act immediately to enforce that order.”

The privacy groups’ letter said that the proposed changes’ “impact on minors is particularly pernicious.” In the proposed policy Facebook asserts:

“If you are under the age of eighteen (18), or under any other applicable age of majority, you represent that at least one of your parents or legal guardians has also agreed to the terms of this section (and the use of your name, profile picture, content, and information) on your behalf.”

“Such ‘deemed consent’ eviscerates any meaningful limits over the commercial exploitation of the images and names of young Facebook users,” the groups wrote.

Copies of the letter were sent to the National Association of Attorneys General, the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Insurance and the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade.

“We urge you to act. The right of a person to control the use of their image for commercial purposes is the cornerstone of modern privacy law,” the groups told the FTC. “Consumer privacy groups have worked diligently to preserve this right and to protect the interests of Facebook users. Now it is up to the FTC based on the Order that is already in place.”

[Jack from Ohio]

I think that a protest against the proposed changes at FaceBook should be a grassroots protest starting with the following actions:

1. Immediately write a letter to FaceBook and demand an instant refund of all subscriptions fees and charges paid for using their social media site.

2. After you accomplish #1, slide back to your room and be quiet.

[jklcpa]

What kind of fees does Facebook have? I thought it was free for individuals.

[Guest Taxed]

I avoid FB and twitter for those reasons.

[Jack from Ohio]

What kind of fees does Facebook have? I thought it was free for individuals.

Do you seriously need my post explained to you??

[jklcpa]

You said users should "demand instant refund of all subscriptions fees and charges paid for using their social media site." It's free. I only skimmed the two posts and I took yours literally. Gee, sorry if I caused you to bang your head. [/sarcasm] *rolls eyes*

[Jack from Ohio]

You said users should "demand instant refund of all subscriptions fees and charges paid for using their social media site." It's free. I only skimmed the two posts and I took yours literally. Gee, sorry if I caused you to bang your head. [/sarcasm] *rolls eyes*

I marvel at how many users of the FREE site FaceBook complain about how it is run. This is America. If you don't like the way that a website given to you FREE is being run, LEAVE!!!

I see lots of posts where FaceBook changes a game, or some format and people line up to threaten leaving.....

[jklcpa]

Jack, I agree with you on that in general. Personally, I don't post anything anywhere on the internet that I wouldn't announce to the public, no matter what privacy settings are selected. But there is something to complain about when a site violates its own privacy policy that was made in settlement with the FTC. People sign up with a certain understanding and expectation, and then what is happening is something different than was agreed to, free or not. If the policy is something different or has changed, it's simple enough for a site to post a revision and let users decide.

[Jack from Ohio]

Jack, I agree with you on that in general. Personally, I don't post anything anywhere on the internet that I wouldn't announce to the public, no matter what privacy settings are selected. But there is something to complain about when a site violates its own privacy policy that was made in settlement with the FTC. People sign up with a certain understanding and expectation, and then what is happening is something different than was agreed to, free or not. If the policy is something different or has changed, it's simple enough for a site to post a revision and let users decide.

So what recourse do they have? All things are explained in great detail in the user agreement. No guarantees of privacy. How can someone, with no money involved, protest about what a FREE website does with information they willingly post on the site?

Missing the logic here....