JohnH Posted September 8, 2018 Report Share Posted September 8, 2018 Funny how we can be blinded by our assumptions at times. A 4-member S-Corp bought out one of the minority-interest shareholders this year. Payment was made by the corp directly to the shareholder, and the purchase price exceeded the par value of the shares. I had never encountered this situation (the S-Corp making the purchase vs other shareholders making the purchase) and so had been assuming all along that treasury stock would create a second class of shareholder. This had been rolling around in my mind for some time, so I decided that today was the day to research it (with the intention of asking a question here if my findings were unclear.) Turns out that it's just a matter of recognizing the treasury stock in the equity section with a PIC entry for the excess over par. No different than accounting for the identical transaction in a C-corp. So this isn't a question - it's a comment. It's amazing what we can learn when we actually do the research instead of depending upon what we assume we know about a situation that may be new to us. Lesson learned (or re-learned). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max W Posted September 9, 2018 Report Share Posted September 9, 2018 I have learned over the years, and especially nowadays, NEVER assume anything. It is sometimes hard to do because every once in a while you slip up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gail in Virginia Posted September 10, 2018 Report Share Posted September 10, 2018 Sometimes my problem is that I learned something so thoroughly years ago, and I was unaware (or forgot!) that it changed. Always a good idea to check to make sure what you KNOW is actually correct. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.