Catherine Posted March 16, 2008 Report Share Posted March 16, 2008 All kinds of non-ATX Massachusetts e-file problems this year!! I've had _so_ many people rejected for completely specious reasons. Latest was a lady rejected because the MA e-file server "doesn't recognize primary or spouse SSN". Well, she's been divorced two years, has NOT changed her name, and e-filed just fine _last_ year. Another one got rejected for "Line items on Sch DI do not match" - except that they _do_ match. I've seen lots of other notes here for MA problems -- are others seeing more problems than usual as well? Think it's because of all the frou-frou with the new Schedule HC? Catherine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkM Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 All kinds of non-ATX Massachusetts e-file problems this year!! I've had _so_ many people rejected for completely specious reasons. Latest was a lady rejected because the MA e-file server "doesn't recognize primary or spouse SSN". Well, she's been divorced two years, has NOT changed her name, and e-filed just fine _last_ year. Another one got rejected for "Line items on Sch DI do not match" - except that they _do_ match. I've seen lots of other notes here for MA problems -- are others seeing more problems than usual as well? Think it's because of all the frou-frou with the new Schedule HC? Catherine I am also getting crazy rejections on my MA Corp extensions. My 355-7004s have been coming back with: MEFMAF355-7004-4 Form 355-7004 The maximum number (2) of accepted corporate extensions Form 355-7004 has been reached. The maximum number (2) of accepted corporate extensions Form 355-7004 has been reached. Does this mean I can only eFile two MA corporate extensions with ATX? ATX says this is a "rejection by agency" error. There have been no other MA extensions filed for these corps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSmith33 Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 I got the same error when I filed one of my corp's yesterday too. I wondered about that and then thought maybe the client had went somewhere else and had them file the extension... I guess I should assume the extension has not been filed... ~Laura Smith, EA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.