schirallicpa Posted October 17, 2017 Report Share Posted October 17, 2017 Taxpayer and wife have a farm. (and losses for the first 3 years, as any good farmer shall have....) Taxpayer claims farm. Taxpayer and wife get loan from the FSA and FSA says they are a partnership since the land is owned jointly and the barns are owned jointly. (Yeah - the FSA wanted the second signature.) But now the Taxpayer is wondering if we should amend past 3 years since their farm is now declared by a federal agency a partnership. In looking at the return, they would get a refund having the farm offset the wife's self-employed income. Is this a 3115 or just amended returns? (remember the good old days when you could just mark the "joint" box on the top of a Schedule F or Schedule C instead of creating 2 and splitting in half.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jklcpa Posted October 18, 2017 Report Share Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) Disclaimer - I don't do farm returns so this reply is meant to generate additional discussion in hopes of getting to the proper reporting and may not be helpful, but I'll take a shot. Thinking out loud - I think these are the main issues regarding the wife's involvement in the farm: First, the wife already has s.e. income from another activity other than the farm. Does she also materially participate in the farming operation in a substantial and significant way for this to really be a partnership for tax reporting purposes? If she doesn't then I'd have trouble calling this a partnership merely because jointly held land and buildings are used in the farm operation and are collateral for the loan. If you think it's a partnership and if she does materially participate, then this can be a qualified joint venture and not be treated as a partnership requiring 1065 reporting, and instead the income and expenses may be split and reported on the appropriate schedules and forms of the 1040. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/married-couples-in-business If the wife doesn't materially participate but you still think this is a partnership, then they can't claim QJV and report only on the 1040. In this case the proper reporting would be on a 1065. Additionally, without her participation, I believe that any loss to her would be considered passive and not be available to offset her other s.e. income. If after all of this, you decide that the 3 years' tax reporting is not correct, I don't see this as a 3115 change at all because there is no change in the income or deductions due to an accounting method change, only a split in the reporting and that the wrong forms were used. Sorry that's so lengthy and might not be of much help. Edited October 18, 2017 by jklcpa typo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.