I could be blinded by age, but I see much of "AI" as a compilation (sometimes stolen, meaning without authorization) of the work of others. A good example is asking an AI bot to create program code. The "answer" likely comes from the work of others as mined from web sites, not from the work of the AI bot creator. This is somewhat an extension of the wayback machine by (IIRC) Internet Archive. Decades ago, I blocked that sort of mining from my site as they did not ask my permission to post my creations (my web sites). I now also block known AI mining bots, so my work does not end up generating profit for others without compensation. A recent article opined AI code snips are maybe 60-90% accurate and should not be relied on.
Imagine if an AI data seller had successfully scanned in all books from the Library of Congress and a few large libraries instead of mining websites. IIRC there was at least one author who brought this up (found their work in an AI dataset) and blocked the use of their copyrighted material. The initial AI grabbing of websites is likely because the majority of site managers were or are not aware of how to protect their work and have a tough time paying for and/or proving infringement. Even this very site is public, and our answers to each other can be mined for AI purposes, unless Eric has implemented blocking the known AI search bots.
A good use of AI is what Tesla is doing for their driving assist, as they can (paraphrasing) use the camera feed and drive track from all their vehicles to provide very updated nav and driving assist without having to hard code things like a wonky 5 way intersection near me (which will soon be replaced by two roundabouts with different numbers of entry/exits which my wife claims she will never use), or the couple of intersections I travel through with a signal in a strange place because of the blind curves. I remember when a new path to my house was made, I submitted it to google maps and the other backend nav companies, and it took months for the maps to be updated. Same for telling them there was a locked fire access/exit gate through a mobile home park which UPS drivers kept thinking was a clear path to us.
Like what Tesla is doing, some sort of self created or learned bot to catch things like tax data entry errors could be handy but will never replace a veteran tax processor.
Sounds like 1800 likely higher paid "makers" will be replaced by more marketing and support (low cost) workers, and the remaining makers will have no choice but to use AI (the work of others) to perform their newly increased workload.