Jump to content
ATX Community

ETax847

Members
  • Posts

    563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by ETax847

  1. I, like Jack, have had this issue come up quite frequently over the past couple of years.  It happens randomly, but when it does, it's a huge time suck as it can often waste 15-30 minutes to get the program running.  I don't know how widespread this problem is, but I would hope to see it addressed in one of their updates since they are fully aware of it.

  2. Today I received a call today from a prospective tax client.  He mentioned how his employer was paying his taxes and paying him in checks that were not included in his W2.  He claimed the employer was paying his taxes on the checks he was receiving and that he did not need to claim the income because his employer was paying the taxes.  Needless to say, I did not agree to help the prospect with his taxes for the upcoming year as I did not think it was correct for him not to claim the income, even if his employer was paying his taxes.

    Has anyone ever encountered a situation like this, where the employer was supposedly paying the taxes on the income and issuing checks to the employee without including this on his W2?  If so, how did you handle it?  What benefits would there be to the employer by doing this?

  3. Depends on the level of service being offered.  I work as a financial advisor, and some advisors charge more because they do more than just manage money.  Don't be so quick to jump to conclusions based on the fee itself

    • Like 2
  4. Per an IRS release today:

    The IRS is refunding the fees that return preparers paid for the Registered Tax Return Preparer test. Letters will be mailed to refund recipients on May 28 and checks will be mailed on June 2. Return preparers took the test between November 2011 and January 2013 and paid a fee of $116. About 89,000 tests were paid for and taken, with some preparers taking the test more than once.

    The refunds are being made because the federal courts determined in Loving v. IRS that the IRS lacked authority to mandate testing.

    The IRS remains committed to the principle that all persons who prepare federal tax returns for compensation should be required to pass a test of minimal competency and take annual continuing education training. Taxpayers deserve top-quality and ethical service from all tax professionals. As part of this commitment, the IRS launched an interim Annual Filing Season Program in 2014 to promote voluntary continuing education by non-credentialed tax return preparers.

    The Administration's 2016 budget proposal would provide the IRS with authority to regulate all paid tax return preparers. Oversight of all paid preparers, coupled with diligent enforcement, would promote high-quality services from all tax professionals, improve voluntary compliance and foster confidence in the fairness of the U.S. tax system.

     

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...