Leaderboard

I have never understood why something like this would work. Why would an honest person turn in a perfectly good gun and I am absolutely certain that a criminal would not turn in one. Whats the point? What is wrong with an honest person having a gun?

The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun. Fact. Reality. Removing guns from the stream will have no effect on the criminals. Still waiting on the law that will cause criminals to start obeying the laws. You will end up with non-working junk.

Do you really want to work on Organizers before the Congress plays football with all the tax laws AFTER the election? Most likely the last week in December? They have set a precedent in this area. Me, too much too soon.

I never even looked to see if I could add an organizer yet until Lynn's note. Sure enough, both organizers are there for tax year 2014. I didn't look in the Forms because the Organizer to add all at once is still grayed out. In the Forms though are the 1040 Organizer and the 1040 Comprehensive Organizer. The one called just Organizer has only 32 general questions and 12 business questions. The one call Comprehensive has LOTS more questions and I really like how you can now add some of your own. Hooray! I don't have to cut and paste my Use Tax question any more! What I don't see are any ACA questions, not even the one above but you would be able to word and include your own, it seems. I think I can get busy after all. Or wait a couple more days to see what appears...

>>Removing guns from the stream will have no effect on the criminals.<< WRONG!!! If you remove all the guns from honest people, the criminals will have a free hand to do whatever they want to do.

Understood, the however there is --- what will the "program do"? It is simple if the answer is yes --- continue moving on. If "no", will the program move to the different forms to figure the penalty, etc. and if so, will they be "mandated" by the "program" to be used in order to e-file, etc.. Given there will be a LOT of entry and information gathering -- there almost MUST be an additional cost as there may be A LOT of additional time. Just a different perspective. Just like the IRS does not "bow to the courts" for use of what is done, said in divorce decrees, etc. --- a lot may depend on how our illustrious "programmers" read and understand (or not) what really needs to be done (hopefully by code and just not what is "understood", read, heard, or been stated in seminars, etc. by the IRS employees or presenters). Remember the IRS has specificially stated that you can not rely on their information (instructions, forms, regulations, etc. as the definitive answer or way to do things -- their words) but MUST rely on the "code" as written. ----- SCARY isn't it ....