Jump to content
ATX Community

Passive Activity Loss Adj on 4797


Marie

Recommended Posts

Client sold rental house at a large loss. When selling the asset in the asset entry part, it went to the Part 1 of 4797, but I have a PAL adjustment (a positive number) of more that half the loss. The oridinary loss it figure went down to ordinary loss, but another worksheet show a carryover. I'm not familiar with this. How is it working?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you gone into the Sch E and clicked on the box for "Complete Disposition of a Passive Activity"? I think that is your problem. It is a two step process to dispose of a rental activity in ATX. You have to do the sale in the Asset Entry form and then click the box on the Sch. E.

Tom

Lodi, CA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I clicked the box that says complete disposition of a passive activity. Now I have the large loss that i thought I should, but it carries down to Part II as ordinary loss, why isn't it a capital loss subject to $3000 per year. The way it looks I will have a NOL carryforward. Does this sound right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

ILLMAS - this relates to your other post from a couple days ago?   I was wondering if you did not check the box on the E when you posted that.

My suggestion is to amend the 2016 return.  If it creates an NOL in 2016, you are going to have to carry it back to 2014 and 2015, since you missed the timeline to elect to carry forward.

Tom
Modesto, CA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BulldogTom said:

ILLMAS - this relates to your other post from a couple days ago?   I was wondering if you did not check the box on the E when you posted that.

My suggestion is to amend the 2016 return.  If it creates an NOL in 2016, you are going to have to carry it back to 2014 and 2015, since you missed the timeline to elect to carry forward.

Tom
Modesto, CA

Yes, I went back to the 2016 return, checked off the complete disposition and there is no limitation, 100% of the loss is following to the 1040, so amending the 2016 should be sufficient?

Thanks

MAS

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...