grandmabee Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 taxpayer usually files HH and get EIC. this year taxpayer was killed in an accident 06/18/08. After child was released from hospital went to live with other parent. Am I correct in assuming that cannot file HH, EIC, or claim dependent because was not half the year. If anyone knows of any exceptions please let me know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 taxpayer usually files HH and get EIC. this year taxpayer was killed in an accident 06/18/08. After child was released from hospital went to live with other parent. Am I correct in assuming that cannot file HH, EIC, or claim dependent because was not half the year. If anyone knows of any exceptions please let me know. I think he/she would qualify. July thru December is 6 months. + from June 19 to the end of the month makes it 6+ months or more then 6 months. This of course if he/she meets the other dependency rules. Eli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAXBILLY Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I think what Eli is saying is that the living parent would qualify for possible EIC but not the deceased parent. The deceased parent would be filed single. taxbilly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I think what Eli is saying is that the living parent would qualify for possible EIC but not the deceased parent. The deceased parent would be filed single. taxbilly Yes, Taxbilly I was. Sorry misread the question. Eli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmabee Posted March 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Yes, Taxbilly I was. Sorry misread the question. Eli That's what I thought,,,, I was hoping there was some obsure thing. Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcjenkins Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Why would you want to find 'some obscure way' to take it away from the person who actually did provide the home for more than half the year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAXBILLY Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 I believe bcolleen just meant that she was verifying the facts. I don't think there was any intent to take it away from someone else. taxbilly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcjenkins Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 She said "I was hoping there was some obscure thing." That was what I was reacting to. And given the nature of dependency and HOH, etc, you can not give it to one parent without taking it from the other. I did not mean it in a mean way, but I did wonder at her way of phrasing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.