BulldogTom

I "Think" you have to start taking them now. IRS just finalized this rule, and I "think" they are automatically waiving the penalties for 2021 & 2022. And I "think" if you take the RMD this year before the due date of your return and then by 12/31 for your 2024 RMD you will be OK. I "Think" the rule for the inherited 401K for you is the same for any first year RMD requirement. As an aside, I am pretty sure you can roll this into an inherited IRA, and I would recommend that you do so, because I "think" the 401K provider does not have to allow you to do what the law says you can do. The 401K plan rules may not be updated. If it was me, I would get it into an inherited IRA and start taking the RMDs over my life expectancy. Lots of "thinking" but nothing concrete from me. Sorry. Tom Longview, TX

I would guess that your client "believed" he was paying the credit card company for the debts and the actual paperwork says he paid the debt relief company for their "services" of getting the debt discharged. Just my opinion, but I think your client is on the hook for the taxes on the discharged debt. Tom Longview, TX

This is really cloudy right now because the rules have changed a bunch. If I understand it correctly, as an eligible beneficiary (because you are not more than 10 years younger than the decedent), you may take the RMDs based you life expectancy. Below is an excerpt from the IRS website: Non-spouse beneficiary options In 2020 and later, options for a beneficiary who is not the spouse of the deceased account owner depend on whether they are an "eligible designated beneficiary." An eligible designated beneficiary is Spouse or minor child of the deceased account holder Disabled or chronically ill individual Individual who is not more than 10 years younger than the IRA owner or plan participant An eligible designated beneficiary may Take distributions over the longer of their own life expectancy and the employee's remaining life expectancy, or Follow the 10-year rule (if the account owner died before that owner's required beginning date) Tom Longview, TX

@Patti in Upstate NY I hope I did not scare you into dumping your clients. That was not my intent. I think how I would handle this is just have a conversation with each, explain that you have a conflict between the two, ask each what it is that they want to do, document in your engagement letter, and do the returns per their wishes if they agree. If they cannot agree, decline the engagement. I want to thank you for bringing this up. It was a very good discussion and it made me think about how I would go about it. Tom Longview, TX

I think Circular 230 says it is. Circular 230 says you cannot ignore the facts that you know when preparing a return. For example, if you know someone is married and they come to you and say they want to file HOH, you cannot ignore what you know to be a fact and file them as HOH. And I am not trying to be a jerk or a smarta$$. I am just pointing out that you are in a position that I would not want to be in. I am not sure how I would handle this. Tom Longview, TX

I think the special rule is that the parents of the child can agree to put them on either return so long as they agree. If there is a disagreement, the tie breaker would go to the mom. I think Patti has an ethical issue on her hands about telling the mom about the situation. She cannot discuss the dad's return with the mom, but she is obligated to do so to properly inform her of the tax ramifications to the mom's return. Sticky situation. Tom Longview, TX

I did a quick google search and I see what you are saying. It is a sweet deal, but it appears that it can only be distributions from a 403(b) account. So, in theory, if I have a senior citizen minister (I do) who is very close to retirement (he is) who has a 401K (he does) and he can convince his church to set up a 403(b), he could roll his 401K into the new 403(b) and when he retires he can take tax free housing allowance distributions? Thanks for the education. I love this board. Tom Longview, TX

At the risk of showing my ignorance....You can do that? Never had a retired minister so I am just wondering how one can get a pension and have it designated as Housing Allowance. Do all the same rules apply? How does one notify the fiduciary on an annual basis to tell them what portion of the pension is designated for housing. Could a retired minister take a distribution from a 401K or IRA and designate it as housing? Wow, never ever thought this was possible. Can someone fill me in on how this works? Tom Longview, TX

IRS Pub 4694 says they are not. Pubs are not authority as you well know. Tom Longview, TX

Not to disagree, but in the year of death, doesn't the taxpayer get "deemed" to have lived the whole year and get the credits and deductions as if they lived the whole year? I am not in a place to look this up, but my first take was the same as Gail's. I don't think the IRS is going to go looking at a decedent tax return that claims a child if no other person claims that child. Tom Longview, TX

What Judy says ^^^. Something doesn't pass the smell test....but I see conspiracies everywhere I look. Tom Longview, TX

Taxpayer has 5 box 12 entries. The company gave him 2 W2s, the second only had the DD code on it. I entered both W2s but ATX says it will not transmit the 2nd one because there are no wages. I am not terribly worried, it is only a DD entry. Never encountered this before. Tom Longview, TX

What are you doing about R&D amortization? I am probably going to extend my one corp that has this issue. Tom Longview, TX

Passed the house. Senate has not voted yet. Tom Longview, TX

I am aware that there are commissions and admin fees included in the cost he paid that are not premiums for insurance and do not increase the cash value of the policy. The thing that has me stumped is this client is pretty meticulous in his recordkeeping, especially for someone 81. He does not have any records of anything coming back to him as dividends. He remembers they sent him a letter telling him he did not need to make payments anymore, but he says he never got a dividend check. As soon as he decides to cash out the surrender value of the policy is nearly equal to the face value of the policy and 100% of all contributions have been returned as non-taxed distributions of premium. Something does not add up. Or maybe it does and I just see conspiracies everywhere I look. Tom Longview, TX

No taxable dividends since I have been doing his returns (5 years). 1099INT from the insurer this year in addition to the 1099R. Cash value was a little higher than the face value of the policy. Tom Longview, TX

I am thinking that is the case. Client tells me that a couple of years ago (? how many) the Insurer told him to stop making payments because the earnings took care of the premiums. I am inclined to believe the calculation of the Insurance company on the surrender. Tom Longview, TX

Facts and Circumstances. Document, document, document. Be ready to defend at audit. You can distinguish the BS from a person who really wanted to start a business and make a profit. IF the expenses were things like filing fees for SOS, software, letterhead, accounting and legal, things that are really business expenses that have receipts and cannot be used personally after the closing of the business, then I say you have a good argument. If the startup expenses are a new iPhone, awesome computer and trips to resorts to hear about an awesome opportunity in a MLM company, then I would be very, very leery. Tom Longview, TX

My point is that when the idiots leave the beltway to campaign and hear that this is a problem, they may try and get something done before the election to win votes before people go to the ballot box. Tom Longview, TX

But the box 1 & box 2 amounts are the same Tom Longview, TX

Client is 81 years old. His father bought him an insurance policy when he was 12. Has paid the $126 per year until last year when he cashed out the policy. 1099R shows distribution fully taxable. Shouldn't the premiums paid over that 68 years be deducted from the taxable amount? Or am I missing something. Tom Longview, TX

I sent my clients who were subject to the reporting the FinCen guide last fall. I think that guide is well written and clearly explains the process. I told my clients I was providing the guide as a courtesy but I would not be filing for them. I have answered a couple of questions about when to file (my advice, this is an election year and some people are upset by this perceived government overreach - so wait till after the elections to see if anything changes in the law). That is as far as I have gone with advice on the situation. Tom Longview, TX

Just read an article on MSN page that Drake software users are also getting those emails. They are after us. They know what we hold in our systems and they want it. Tom Longview, TX

How are you getting into the K2/K3? It is not available in ATX yet. I have 2 that I am waiting for the K2/K3 to download so I can finish up. Tom Longview, TX

A quote from a Bloomberg article this morning on MSN: "A coalition of 250 business groups including the US Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable and National Association of Manufacturers has lobbied hard for the legislation authored by Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith and Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden. Boeing Co., General Motors Co., Deere & Co., Caterpillar Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Apple Inc. are among the companies that stand to benefit, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. The measure would restore expired tax breaks allowing businesses to more quickly recoup the costs of domestic research and development, interest on business loans and investment in equipment." If you want to know what Congress is going to do....follow the money. Tom Longview, TX