Jump to content
ATX Community

CA Help on Loan Mod and Cancelled Debt


Tax Prep by Deb

Recommended Posts

Ok this one would be real simple had California conformed to Federal on Cancelled Debt.

Client had a loan modification on a non recourse loan (acquisition debt only) that resulted in 199,400 being cancelled (1099C issued box 5 not checked) with a fair market value of 186,569.  Balance on the loan after the forgiveness is $109,500.  (doesn't look right to me, but these figures are on the 1099C and mortgage statement).

With federal it is all excluded and basis of home reduced.  California doesn't conform and it appears that because they kept the home we have to treat the COD as income unless insolvent.

Is my understanding correct on this?  Any thought would be greatly appreciated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are on the correct track.  I would attack it from the insolvency direction.  There is a reason for the forgiveness.  It is not just from the goodness of the bank shareholders heart that they modified the loan.  Did you check to make sure that the loan balance on the 1099C is not inflated with a bunch of accrued "penalty rate interest"?  Could it be that the loan balance before penalty interest and fees was much smaller?  If they are cancelling the debt, but that debt is inflated by interest, you might have a mortgage interest deduction for a big chunk of that cancelled debt.  Get your clients loan docs and see what the real purchase price of the home was and what the real balance of the loan was.

And of course, do a quick look at the assets of the client and see if you can get it all written off under insolvency, or at least a part of it.

Tom
Newark, CA

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Tom,

I have already done that and the doc's actually appear correct.  In other words they make sense including the FMV of the home at the time of the forgiveness.  I have done the insolvency sheet and it appears we can deduct about 1/2 of the cancelled debt.  Was hoping for more but had a feeling I was seeing it right.  There was talk earlier that maybe perhaps they will vote to change this and retroactively at that, so I'm watching to see if the guys in big chief in Sacramento will do so.  I don't have many of these now, nothing like 4 to 5 years ago, but homes were I'm at are still under water.  Getting better, but still not there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...