Jump to content
ATX Community

Fishing License: expense or capitalize?


Jack from Ohio

Recommended Posts

Commercial fishing client in Washington State.  Renewal of her commercial fishing license is $50K.  This is for 10 years.

My first reaction is that they can take it all as expense this year.  However, since the license is for 10 years, does that prevent expensing it all in 2018?

Extra information:  They have proclaimed that this year was a very good fishing year, so the expense won't create a noticeable bump, in their expenses.

Just wanting some more opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/fishing-tax-center

The term “section 197 intangible” is defined to include “any license, permit, or other right granted by a governmental unit or any agency or instrumentality thereof.” Thus, for example, the capitalized cost of acquiring from any person a liquor license, a regulated airline route, or a television or radio broadcasting license is to be amortized over a 15-year period.

Consequently, the definition of an amortizable intangible can be interpreted to include a limited entry fishing permit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Roberts said:

section 197 intangible when you buy.

I'd say it is amortized over the life of the license.

Very few things are amortized over their useful life. 197 intangibles is 15 years regardless, but you would have a balloon amount of amortization in the final year when it becomes worthless.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Abby Normal said:

Very few things are amortized over their useful life. 197 intangibles is 15 years regardless, but you would have a balloon amount of amortization in the final year when it becomes worthless.

JMO but the cost of initially incurring the license (legal fees and so forth) would be 15 year.

Would not the cost of the license itself be Sec 167 and amortized over the life of the intangible? The license itself has a set life expectancy. For example I wouldn't amortize my every three year EA license fee for 15 years with a lump sum in year 3.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Roberts said:

JMO but the cost of initially incurring the license (legal fees and so forth) would be 15 year.

Would not the cost of the license itself be Sec 167 and amortized over the life of the intangible? The license itself has a set life expectancy. For example I wouldn't amortize my every three year EA license fee for 15 years with a lump sum in year 3.

I think you're right, after reading Sec 167 & 1.197-2(c)(13)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...