Jump to content
ATX Community

Conflict of Interest


Bart

Recommended Posts

>>now that they are divorced<<

You can probably proceed if there does not appear to be any genuine conflict. But even with a release of information you are on rocky ethical ground when you need to decide who claims the kids or what qualifies as alimony. Generally you should pick one and refer the other elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lion's example is a good one. A married couple client of mine went through a nasty divorce this year, and I've already

made up my mind about dropping one and keeping the other as a client. Had to prepare the 2008 returns under different

scenarios (Joint vs Separate, husband claiming 1,2, or 3 kids versus wife claiming none, etc.) then submit all of the various

filing schemes to both attorneys. I was accused of violating confidentiality by one of the spouses, which I didn't.

The 2008 returns were filed on October 15th. Glad to have that one completed.

Booger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>then submit all of the various filing schemes to both attorneys. I was accused of violating confidentiality<<

A fair accusation, in my opinion. Did you have a written release of information to show the opposing attorney what was being reported on the separate return? That's how it goes down. Remember, it is common (to put it mildly) that lack of honest communication (to put it mildly) was a factor in the breakup (to put it mildly) of the marriage. And of course, they don't always put it mildly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jainen, I got a written release from both before I submitted the husband's returns to the wife, and vice-versa.

The couple couldn't even agree on what address to use on the returns. hers or his. I recommended that one of the attorneys

office address be used, since joint returns were filed and a joint refund check was coming.

Booger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is terrible when people who have kids can not talk to each other politely, but it happens way too often. And when they are contemplating filing jointly, of course you have to be privy to all the data from both sides. But I'd pick one to go forward with, and politely drop the other. It's just not worth the stress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>I got a written release from both<<

Smart. But not always good enough because even if you have "permission" to release information you still have a duty to only act in the client's best interest. And if that doesn't happen to also be in your OTHER client's best interest, which is likely, then your problem is that much larger BECAUSE of the release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...