"Probably a lot more to this story."
The temp officer (at least in action) employee was naive (at best). Their testimony was 100% incriminating, tough to believe they even had representation. Oddly, I often get flamed when I point out how anyone who is part of the payroll process needs protection from this very issue. Even those who have no signatory power/responsibility. A payroll keypuncher who could have seen no withheld items were ever paid, those who login only to make deposits, etc., can all be named in a suit, and at best will have to pay to defend.
I carry insurance for frivolous suits, even though I am not liable at all, defense is expensive. I bet all here do the same.