rob

Opinions please. We are phasing out our SBS 2003. With years of old QB's, years back of ATX, Proseries 2013 what would be a better choice? SBS 2008 or Server 2012. I was thinking originally Server 2012 but didn't realize it has pretty much the Windows 8 look. And I am worried many programs will not run on Server 2012. Thanks.

[email protected] Thanks.

Looking for an accounting system with source code. Any suggestions? Thanks.

Totally agree. No good can come out of in staying in 12.13. This time of year speed can't be as much an issue as it was pre - April 15. It is what it is. BTW, I never really noticed much of a problem with 12.18. It was as bad as the previous updates but not worse - including 12.13.

We have HP - 4 Plus's and HP - 5's networked, one for each user but available to any other workstation. Re-charge cartridges are 59.00 / 69.00 (at 12ppm by the way). Very high volume, very low maintenance. (Source of re-charge also fixes them, very cheap labor - and all cartridges are guaranteed.)

With ATX, blanket statements don't hold true. We have domain server with 10 workstations. XP on 2 year old workstation (we had choose XP over 7 for workstation at time of ordering) is MUCH faster than our newer Windows 7 machines with equivalent hardware. XP has 4 GB installed (sees of course 3GB or so) and 8 GB on Windows 7 machines. All I7 processors. Switched network cables, etc to make sure it wasn't network related with the speed difference.

I am too.

Domain. Couple years ago we were on a peer to peer. If different operating systems conflicting during use is an issue, I could most certainly see it happening on a peer to peer network.

It's not believing, it's working on our network. And I've seen other hardware setups similar to ours mentioned in these forums, with XP and 7 workstations. Working. Support said that above statement was badly worded and they DO support workstations running XP and 7 at the same time. They were trying to stress multiple sessions (remote desktop and TServices) would not work because workstation has a snapshot of data base on local station and two instances would not work.

I just talked to support again today to clarify some of the points brought up in this and ATX's own forum. There should be no problem running a mix of XP and 7 machines (as we do but others had said it won't work.) Their update for today will deal with backup / restore mostly. There are a couple more scheduled for 2012 version but most of their focus is on 2013. Support was testing network enhancements for next year, said it will be quite fast on networks. Changing the way workstations and server communicate - this won't effect 2012 sorry to say. Anyway, I will believe when I see it. Support was pleased with it (and I asked if he had anything to do with 2012 version, he laughed and said not guilty.)

We have server and 8 work stations. Two are Windows 7 and the rest are XP. We never had a problem accessing database at same time. Usually we 5 or 6 logged in at a time doing returns. The system was slow if we had more than one person rolling over returns, and of course overall it was much slower than prior ATX versions, but it worked. Electronic filing was the only part of program we needed to designate one user to do (which makes sense, and prior versions of ATX were the same.) Only limitation was I couldn't remote desktop into server if I had it running already on server. We don't use terminal services so that never applied to us.

We have used this for years. Local company. Very easy to use. http://instantsoftwaresolutions.com/ Ask for Dave.

Our ATX past and this year's quote is under 2,000 with multi-user, all states, unlimited efiles, etc (obviously with it's flaws - 2012 version). Server with workstations was our installation. UT and Lacerte are one year quotes? They are that much more or am I missing something? I requested a Drake demo to look at and want to check out other products but certainly not much more than we are currently paying with CCH. Thanks for any suggestions.

We have a domain server too. Server is SBS 2003, XP and Windows 7 Pro workstations. With 4gb and 8gb memory. Also have a test stand-alone running XP. Very slow, freeze ups, impossible backup / restore, reset 2011 path over and over, kick out of efile, kill ATXLoader2012 process. Problems were almost the same for server vs stand-alone. Before server, we used to run a peer to peer network. I cannot imagine how that would be suggested over domain - even with all of this year's problems. (And when we had peer to peer, we were running the "good" ATX (pre 2012). It was so slow and more apt to lose mapped drive connections.

I ran ATX off server for a while (rolling over clients). It seemed to choke the system for other users. (ATX told me they recommended users work off workstations so I quit using server as the "rollover machine".) My times were about the same as above. I don't think XP vs 7 operating system made much difference. 2012 is just slow. We bought workstations loaded with XP when first of Windows 7 machines were coming out (thus most of our systems are not that old). A couple of our XP machines are as fast as our new Windows 7 workstations btw (speed is relative of course)