-
Posts
4,184 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
63
Everything posted by Margaret CPA in OH
-
Thanks, Jack. Rationale being protection of income, I presume.
-
A self-employed client severely injured while working filed for and finally received SS benefits. He calls it disability but it is a normal SSA-1099. It shows Attorney fees fo $6000 under the description of amount in box 3 (along with payments and MC Part B premiums). It also includes $7898.14 paid in 2012 for 2011. He said he did not begin receiving benefits until June 2012. What, if anything, to do with the attorney fees?
-
Ummm, yes, I think I'm right about this, too, or not...
-
Deleting discarding forms-software locks up 12.7
Margaret CPA in OH replied to CdogTdog's topic in General Chat
Same here. Some of us just work in certain ways and really have trouble changing easily. I have had (knock wood) very few issues and really cannot complain. And now I hope I have not jinxed myself! I do fervently hope that ATX not only makes it through this year but is around for the next several years until I retire. -
I should probably finally pay a professional
Margaret CPA in OH replied to Eric's topic in General Chat
Just note the risk of scanning and emailing that any document with SSN and other identifying info without encryption is fodder for id theft. I have personally had very little deterioration with faxed documents perhaps in part because I don't print them on paper, they go directly to pdf. If there is a document with an issue I either ask for a resend or clarification of whatever is the issue. Obviously Jack's experience is different from mine and our preferences for client sent documents is different. His over 100 clients may have encryption capability readily available along with the knowledge to use it. Most of mine don't but do have access to a fax machine. Diff'rent strokes but room for all! -
I should probably finally pay a professional
Margaret CPA in OH replied to Eric's topic in General Chat
My clients from as far as Switzerland and Australia fax to my dedicated fax where I 'print' them to pdf so paperless. Others in MN, MA, and NC also fax but one does send as pdf encrypted email attachments. Most folks don't have encryption capabilities on their home computers and/or don't know how to use but that is how I send virtually all my returns back to clients to review and return Form 8879 to efile. -
So what to do when the student qualifies but software calculates no? Time to play around, I guess.
-
I am baffled by this worksheet as it says (#4) if the student has claimed the American Opportunity Credit for any of the 4 prior years they are no longer eligible and must take Lifetime Learning Credit. But if 2011 year was the first year claimed and ARRA extended it through 2012 (per IRS website), why cannot the student take it for 2012? I must be missing something, I guess, but this doesn't seem right at all.
-
Here's the scoop: I had to hire an attorney to help sell my house because: My real estate agent, BY with Comey and Shepherd was negligent in enforcing the terms of the listing contract on my behalf. I was not informed of a change in buyer financing from FHA to DOA until the loan was denied by the DOA, 5-6 weeks after listing contract was signed. The change from FHA to DOA required my signature on a contract amendment. All this caused a 4-5 week delay in closing. The buyers eventually got an FHA loan approved. It was at the point of learning (March 17. 2012) that the buyers had applied for a DOA loan without my approval of this change that I hired an attorney. Although I met every timeline specified in the contract for the seller, most of the timelines specified in the contract for buyers were not met. The negligence of BY led to her paying my rent from March 24? (I will get you date) - April 6th so that I would not lose the house I rented due to delays in closing on the house I sold. My attorney had to talk with landlords to work out this agreement, and also to get penalty fees waived for late rent and the breaking of the lease at one point (which did not actually happen) after buyers' loan was not originally pproved. There is a ton of documentation to show the negligence - communication between my agent, Comey and Shepherd broker, Title Company and me; and between my attorney and the Comey and Shepherd Attorney. SA of Comey and Shepherd had KB, the attorney for Comey and Shepherd, put a lien on my house on the day of closing just prior to closing. My attorney took legal measures to get this lien released. The reason the lien was put on my house, according to VL who was the attorney who represented the Comey and Shepherd agents, is that I was not going to show up at closing. I had, however, signed the contract addendum that to appear at closing on April 10th, 2012 at 4:00 pm and all parties had a copy of this addendum that I signed. I always had every intention of attending closing and told no one otherwise. My attorney attended closing with me to protect my interests: He asked KB at closing if he was legal representation for Comey and Shepherd in matters related to the sale of my home and KB replied, "No." We learned, however, that KB was representing Comey and Shepherd on the lien placed on my house. So, he directly lied to my attorney. When asked by the Title Company at closing if I had any liens placed on my home, I replied "No". However, the lien had been filed on my home just prior to closing by KB, representing SA. BY knew about the filing of this lien. All 3 Comey and Shepherd folks were silent during me being questioned by the Title Company about whether were any liens on my home. My attorney and I did not find out about the lien until April 11, 2012 when a copy of it arrived in my mail box. So it appears as though Pacun has the answer as this was directly related to buying or selling an investment, her house and could reduce capital gain, if any. Sadly that will not help as she already has a small loss. Thanks all for this exercise. I feel for her but it is what it is. Profound, no?
-
Thanks, Pacun. Rationale? Cite? Other attorney costs on the closing are expenses of sale. I will find out more as to the reason yet.
-
Thanks again, MAS. I think I need details as to exactly why she had to hire an attorney. If it was just an issue with a particular realtor and maybe not good marketing or disagreements about Open Houses or some such, well, need more info! If an expense of sale there is no difference. If itemized deduction, a change from owing $600+ to a refund of $100+. So it matters.
-
Thanks, MAS, I knew that much. The question relates to whether this goes directly to the sale of her home because it isn't on the closing statement. She did have a home office so the point may be stretched, really thin, that it was protecting business interest but I don't like that. I really don't think it goes anywhere but always look to this board when in doubt and cannot find specifc, on point references. And I do look first... Thanks again!
-
Bump - anyone?
-
I see the issue - I don't have a Getaway home. Next year's wish list, for sure! But then I couldn't afford my dive trips to exotic places to get away. Both, now that would be nice
-
I think Marilyn and I are twins. About 90% of what she wrote reflects my situation. I don't use a laptop for business, though, and I only have 8g Ram.
-
Ah, yes, those pesky conversions! Agreed much more info needed. So glad you are on the board.
-
Client had issues with realtor so went to attorney to resolve. Fees were $9000. As this sort of was related to getting her house sold, I am inclined to think expense of sale although not directly. Because the sale did not result in any taxable income and was not business related I think it does not have a place on Sch A. Other thoughts? I suspect she is expecting a deduction. Thanks.
-
Thanks for the clarification, jainen. That's why I posted the pub info. with all the qualifications for the OP to determine how the situation at hand might fit. Admittedly I did not personally read all the details and used the word 'should' in my reply because I thought an idea behind the Roth was that the contributions were post tax and the earnings would be tax-free as well with the holding period. I will have to read ALL the fine print one day when I am faced with the OP's situation.
-
Then I think it should not be taxable, one of the ideas behind the Roth. This is from Pub. 590 http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch02.html#en_US_2012_publink1000231084 Distributions After Owner's Death If a Roth IRA owner dies, the minimum distribution rules that apply to traditional IRAs apply to Roth IRAs as though the Roth IRA owner died before his or her required beginning date. See When Can You Withdraw or Use Assets? in chapter 1. Distributions to beneficiaries. Generally, the entire interest in the Roth IRA must be distributed by the end of the fifth calendar year after the year of the owner's death unless the interest is payable to a designated beneficiary over the life or life expectancy of the designated beneficiary. (See When Must You Withdraw Assets? (Required Minimum Distributions) in chapter 1.) If paid as an annuity, the entire interest must be payable over a period not greater than the designated beneficiary's life expectancy and distributions must begin before the end of the calendar year following the year of death. Distributions from another Roth IRA cannot be substituted for these distributions unless the other Roth IRA was inherited from the same decedent. If the sole beneficiary is the spouse, he or she can either delay distributions until the decedent would have reached age 70½ or treat the Roth IRA as his or her own.
-
If it was a traditional IRA, it is taxable as the decedent deferred tax on it during life. If decendent had received distributions, they would have been taxable at that time.
-
I second that. It would then maybe be easier to find threads that address one's particular problem.
-
Another software glitch...paper refund check
Margaret CPA in OH replied to Cathy's topic in General Chat
Possibly a silly question but are you sure that you checked Paper Check option for refund? I forgot that once last year and nearly cried until I figured it out then nearly cried because I had overlooked it. With this year's program though, maybe another gremlin in which case delete the 1040 EF Info sheet and readd? I dunno... -
Thanks for the heads up. Took me 3:56 but I am bummed. Still no planner and still can't print efile acks. Sigh....
-
OH Lump Sum Retirement/distribution credit
Margaret CPA in OH replied to Janitor Bob's topic in General Chat
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/5747 Try somewhere here maybe.