JohnH

A decedent's estate is an eligible shareholder of an "S" corp. So it appears that the estate is a shareholder until the shares are transferred to another eligible individual.

I just had to tell this somewhere. My 9-year-old grandson filled out his paperwork for the new school year over the weekend. He understood exactly what was needed for Name, Address, Phone, Birthdate, etc. When he came to the part that listed "Emergency Contact", he entered "911". Hard to argue with that logic...

I have 5 monitors spread among 3 computers, all of them actively in use every day.

You can also modify the Master in ATX to make the printing on the "Return Cover Sheet" in the "Client Letter" line up with the cutouts in the Tenenz Folders. It requires a little trial & error, but works very well. Instead of "Federal Tax Returns", mine just says "Income Tax Returns". I then add the company info so it prints on the cover sheet & shows through the lower cutout on the Tenenz folder, so when the return is ready for stapling I just lay the cover sheet on top and staple away. I keep a second stapler on hand for the really thick returns, and I find that up to 30-40 pages can easily be stapled with a 1/2" staple after lining them up. Once the size of the return exceeds what the hidden staple folder will hold, it's on to a pressboard binder with the bulit-in Acco Clips. It costs more, but when the return & corresponding invoice gets that big, a $5 binder is in order.

Tenenz used to be called "Tax Aid". I think that was the original name before they merged with "HG Professional Forms".

Or you could just contact Tenenz. Good prices, great service, excellent web site, rapid delivery. http://www.tenenz.com/

And now, for the dual-monitor aficionado who has everything, we introduce: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/6105...-Christmas.html

Well, this helps explain why so many of my clients were extra cranky this year - I repainted my ceiling just before tax season began.

Nobody's tying to deify St Ronaldus. :)

But Mike, how's the client supposed to answer the question when they don't know what we need to hear? :)

I suppose now we're going to have to endure the shameless remarketing of "ObamaCare" by changing it to "KennedyCare". Politicians are expert at finding new ways to put lipstick on the pig, and this opportunity is just TOO tempting.. Makes me want to turn off the TV and quit reading/listening to the news.

You might want to consider adding a "hassle factor" into your bill. From what you've posted, I suspect you're likely to be seeing a lot more of this client in the coming months. And quite a bit of that time is likely to be spent explaining why it wasn't YOU who got all this hassle from the IRS started.

There's an excellent article about the healthcare system and the insurance system in the current issue of The Atlantic. It's entitled "How American Health Care Killed My Father" by David Goldhill. In the interest of full disclosure, he states early in the article that he's a Democrat, but the article is definitely not political - he isn't a hired gun attempting to promote one agenda or the other, IMO. Although I disagree with a few of his assertions here & there, I find it to be overall a comprehensive assessment of the many structural, functional, and philosophical problems with our current system. ( I especially appreciated his point that much of the health care system is so low-tech that "my dry cleaner uses a more elaborate system to track shirts than this hospital uses to track treatment.") I didn't care much for his cumbersome solution because I think it's unworkable, but that takes nothing away from his excellent description of how we got to where we are. It's a thoughtful, enlightening article and well worth the time it will take to read all 13 pages. Highly recommended for anyone wanting to gain additional insights in this problem affecting all of us.

Glad to help out. And just in case anybody is tempted to advance the idea that Barney Frank is just one person or that his deception doesn't represent the prevailing view, here are a few of his cronies clarifiying their dishonest position: http://commonsense.wbt.com/index.cfm;jsess...c665574f25554e5 Just click on the YouTube clip to get an earful.

Now there's a marketing idea. Someone should develop a "Burma Shave" app for our GPS systems.

I think true impartiality was always a pipe dream (or a scam). All information has to be edited in some form or another, and one's biases have to influence HOW the editing is done. I'd rather see the presenters on both sides admit their biases while giving us the news rather than to pretend to be unbiased when they aren't. That way I can enjoy Rachel Maddow, Keith Olberman, Chris Matthews, etc, then switch over to Bill O'Reilly, Shawn Hannity, or Rush Limbaugh, (insert your favorite figures on both sides here) and make a more reasoned decision about what each side is trying to tell me about what I'm seeing & hearing. (Even though I still won't know if something important has been edited out by both sides, I can gain a better perspective and maybe decide to dig a little deeper) The reporting on this particular story is beyond despicable, and should be front-page news everywhere. Wherever this story has been dealt with, I haven't yet heard anyone advance even the wildest rationale defending it. Even the Ragin Cajun Carville or Paul Begala haven't spoken out on it, and they're both capable of contorting reality to defend almost anything the left does.

Just so we're clear on whether the intent of the present crowd is to take away your right to buy private insurance, here's the ultimate plan straight from the horse's mouth. (Well, maybe from the other end of the horse, but in any case Barney makes his point very succinctly). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3BS4C9el98

Yes, jainen is right. The camel's head has been in the tent for a long time, but now we're seeing the rest of the body begin to make its way inside. And it's a huge camel.

Can't wait to hear the questions from clients if this went anywhere. "Does my chinchilla count? How about my kid's turtles, ant farm, boa constrictor, etc?"

Happy Birthday Taxbilly. And thanks for your diligence in keeping up with birthdays for everyone on this Forum.

Never underestimate the ability of a group of arrogant MBA's and marketing geniuses to completely destroy a growing company. They are incredibly skilled at accelerating this process to the point that nobody knows what happened until they've collected their bonuses and have moved on to create a disaster at another business.

You probably have plenty of ways to find the discrepancy and don't need my help, but QB's ability to print to Excel is extremely valuable in this situation. I'd set up a report showing only deposits, then export it to an Excel spreadsheet. Then add a column beside it and list each deposit directly from the bank statement. Anything that's on the bank statement that isn't in the QB column is probably the culprit. (you might have to do a little adjusting for in transit items at the end of each month, but that process flows pretty well once you identify one or two of them). Add a couple of "Comments" columns and you have your analysis to hand to the auditor. I'd expect to be able to knock out a minimum of 100 deposits per hour using this approach.

Based on what I've seen so far, I'd exchange Obama for the last one without a moment's hesitation. Whatever you may think of Bush, excusing Obama's blunders by comparing him to Bush or anybody else just won't cut it. But if you insisnt on omparing Obama to another president, I'm still inclined to put him in the category of our worst president of my lifetime - Jimmy Carter. This administration is definitely shaping up to be the second Carter term (as predicted).

Another addition to my list of reasons not to prepare these FTHB credits. I see no need to wave a red flag at the bull even if everything is on the up-and-up. I'm sending them to HRB - they have the deep pockets if something goes wrong.

Today's news reports that the program to help people buy more fuel efficient cars is being suspended, then maybe it isn't, or maybe it is - we just don't know right now. What is clear is that they somehow failed to either 1) predict demand or 2) estimate the total amount needed to keep the program running for a reasonable period of time. This type of shoot-from-the-hip legislation is at best incompetent and at worst deceptive. And these are the people who want to take over health care administration? I can envison the day when I develop a heart problem and the bureaucrat assigned to interview me on my mandatory end-of-life counseling says "Sorry, we failed to predict how many pacemakers we needed, so you'll just have to wait until the next budget year to get yours. Good luck."