Jim Oh Bkkr Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 8 hours ago, BulldogTom said: Not like I am being childish Does sound childish to me. Sounds like good advice. (Coming from the last guy to sign up for E-file!) 8 hours ago, BulldogTom said: Then we can have all our clients opt out of efile Seems like when I studied up on the E-file rules, we ARE NOT allowed to voice that opinion to clients. But I do appreciate that they let me spend 2,500 dollars before announcing this info! Quote
Gail in Virginia Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 22 hours ago, Abby Normal said: Well, they're trying to make it harder for those fraudsters to log into your account. But are we solving a problem that doesn't exist? Have fraudsters been logging into PTIN accounts? Especially to renew them and pay the fee? 3 1 Quote
Catherine Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 16 hours ago, BulldogTom said: Not like I am being childish about this or anything.... We can think about it; that's 90% of the joy and 0% of the repercussions! 1 1 Quote
Abby Normal Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 11 hours ago, Gail in Virginia said: But are we solving a problem that doesn't exist? Have fraudsters been logging into PTIN accounts? Especially to renew them and pay the fee? Perhaps. The IRS did ask us to check our PTIN accounts to see if the number of returns filed uner our PTIN seemed reasonable. But they're probably stealing our PTINs from copies of returns we've prepared. That's why our PTINs are masked on the client copy now. For years, they were not masked. Quote
JohnH Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago And just think of how many of us have clients whose tax returns from prior to 2000 are lying around with our social security numbers on them. (or tossed in the garbage when they did house cleaning or by their heirs) 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.