If her motive is profit, my answer would be yes.
I successfully got a "no change" on a partnership audit, because of years of regular losses. They partners ARE in it for a profit motive. They're just really bad business-people. That first part IS in the IRS regs, and the second part is NOT. I think the main part of my argument was simply that incompetence does not preclude profit motive, and was able to show that motive as well as (futile) steps taken to improve. That's a long-winded way of stating the simple fact that several years of losses does not, prima facie, constitute lack of profit motive.
If, however, she still skates professionally "because she loves it" and would do so even if never paid, then you have a hobby. If she is working on her standing to open a school, then you're in a gray area; does she have profit motive for what she is doing currently?