
Randall
Donors-
Posts
2,418 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
23
Everything posted by Randall
-
Thanks. I was just curious. I plan to get a new computer later in the year. Windows 7 is scheduled out by the holidays but that could be delayed. Then there will probably be all the usual problems with that as well. I'd prefer not to get the new OS until SP1 is out. And ATX, QB, Peachtree usually are a year (version) behind. There's been a lot of negative talk about Vista but I wonder if that's just the techies doing their usual thing.
-
What operating system did you purchase? Vista? 32 bit? 64 bit?
-
I hope there are no dial up users out here. I know one poster didn't have a choice at one time. But DSL is slow enough at times. I'd hate to think about using dial up.
-
I can only guess that they see a lot of the smaller programs being bought by the bigger companies. Do you know if they are independently owned? I'm like you. I don't anticipate in changing from ATX. But you never kinow what might happen. I've got Drake on my mental list and was just wondering about TaxSlayer. I hope I'm outta of here by the time I would feel the need to switch.
-
I've never contacted them but receive their postcard as well as from others. I'm not planning to change from ATX unless the program goes down or the price jumps quite a bit. I hate and dread to change. But I like to keep a mental note of the alternatives. I think Drake would be high on my list if I were to make a change some day. I like to take note of comments on various programs.
-
Now that TRX won't be selling any more ATX ...
Randall replied to Don in Upstate NY's topic in OLTPRO / OneDesk
Interesting questions. I've wondered about the business model on both sides of this too. If you believe some of the info a few years ago, there were about 70,000 ATX users. Of course, not all would purchase the full package. CCH must have paid a pretty penny to purchase ATX. So, they need to recoup that with as much profit margin as possible. I can understand why they got rattled with TRX selling the product so cheaply. They were probably hearing a stampede coming. -
Wow. This is when I call my techie. I'll try to troubleshoot the software and the paripheral equipment (plug and play stuff). But opening the box, it's all greek to me.
-
Anyone know about the TaxSlayer software?
-
I'm not a techie. I think the better way is to have a techie upgrade your system. But a few years ago, I purchased a low priced monitor. I didn't have an extra port on my computer to plug in the 2nd monitor. I purchased an adaptor (Tritan), plugged the monitor into the adaptor, plugged the adaptor into my computer using an available USB port. The adaptor came with software that allows me to use the 2nd monitor as an extension of the 1st, a mirror of the 1st, or even as the primary (with the 1st monitor as the secondary). It has worked well for me. Low cost and I was able to do it myself. I plan to buy a new system later this year and make sure I have the availability to go with at least two monitors, maybe three.
-
"Sorry for the delay"
-
Any computer person know what a 'Cisco Switch' is?
Randall replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
Didn't it always end with the two sitting still on horseback, saying to each other, 'Ah, Ceeesco, ah, Pancho! -
Any computer person know what a 'Cisco Switch' is?
Randall replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
Then there was a song back in the 70s or so. I can't remember the name or group but they kept singing the refrain, 'The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine' Diablo, spanish for devil. -
I've never e-filed extensions before but I'm trying to same some time. Is this the ATX procedure: Open the return, open Form 4868, go to the efile tab, input the pin, etc. Wait for acceptance notice just as with the 1040? With the paper extensions, there's no signature requirement. I'm assuming there's nothing for the efiled extension? I realize a payment may be needed on some, but I think I'll go with the paper extensions for those clients.
-
Then there's a different address if you agree and are sending a check from the address if you disagree and are not sending a check. I had a recent situation where we agreed with some changes but not all. I advised the client to send a check for what I calculated with the agreed items. I didn't know which address to use. I chose one, can't remember off the top of my head, but I think it was the address to send with payment. Haven't heard back yet.
-
On the W-2 earnings summary of a RR employee (not in the W2 boxes), there is a list of income items minus the pretax items with total earnings amount which matches amount in box 1 for taxable wages. Listed below that amount is a negative shown as deductions for meal allowance. What is this? As presented, it seems it would be an after tax deduction from the employee's pay. But would the employer charge the employee? Wouldn't they pay the employee? Or note this as a deduction before taxable amount (pre-tax)? Or show in W2 code L? Anyone know about this?
-
I know there have been a lot of posts on this topic. I tried looking back to find my issue. Client divorced in 2008. He gets to claim all three children for 2008. The IRS site is showing a $1500 stimulus payment. The site says if his filing status is something other than married joint, use $750 to calculate his recovery rebate credit for 2008? This calculates to $1500 minus $750, giving him another $750. Am I missing something. I know if the couple was already divorced, each might end up getting the amount for the same child in the two different years, but this one seems a little different.
-
This is how I do it. I install two states, then add other forms when and if needed.
-
I thought I was cheap. I'm easy. I'd tell them it'll be more but I'm usually easy on these things. As others suggest, if they can organize the info for you, that'll help. I try to warn clients if there's a significant change, my fee will be higher. But going from $60 to $300 will be a shock to their system. You have to gauge it yourself.
-
The clergy worksheet in ATX is still in draft form waiting IRS approval. I've compared the draft to the worksheets in Pub 517 and I don't see any differences. Is it ok to attach these worksheets to Form 8453? Or do I need to wait for final approval. Return has not been efiled yet. And I know I need to send the 8453 within 3 days of acceptance of efiling. But do I have to wait on efiling the return until the worksheets are approved?
-
Suddenly, the created and modified dates are not showing up on a printed report, only a five digit number. The dates are visible on screen. Any one else seeing this?
-
I got a call recently. He was on a mission in Africa. His church sent him two checks per month, one for his personal pay, the other for certain expenses incurred for the mission. He didn't receive a W-2 or 1099. He said the church made some tax payments for him with the 1040-ES. I wasn't sure of all that was going on, so I told him to first contact his church to see how they handled things. I asked if he was ordained and he said no, just on some type of mission. I'm not sure the church is handling this correctly. I haven't heard back from him yet. But as a heads up, how should the church be treating him in this type of case?
-
I don't have a cite, but I think there's a prevailing viewpoint that renting to a family member at about 20% below FMV is acceptable, the reasoning being that they will take better care of the property, etc. You might want to follow up some research on that angle.
-
Client has IRA account statments (one each for both spouses) for January 2009 showing distributions on 1/9/09. No 1099Rs for 2008. He says the checks received in Jan09 are for 2008 distribution. I seems he's 9 days late on his RMD. Do I calculate penalty on 5329 or does he just wait for the IRS to assess penalty. Is there a remedy? Can he get the penalty waived? Then if so, how is it reported? I'm thinking if he gets distribution in Dec09, he'll have a 1099R for 2009 showing total of two distributions. Anyone have experience in something like this?
-
Good luck on getting the insurance company to issue a corrected 1099.