Catherine

Thanks; figured that's what would end up happening. I was just hoping there was some magic way...

Another convoluted question from a client. At least this one came to me first. Client is looking ahead to selling home in another year or so but realized there are basis issues. I've got all of them but one sorted out with cites to back me up, but the answer to this one is hiding. I know that posting the query is the best way to find the answer in my sources! This client had rolled over gain from sale of a prior home into this one -- back around 1991, when you could still defer gain as long as the new home cost more than the one sold. My vague recollection is that this gets no special treatment, and as long as you go over the exclusion amounts, you pay tax on total gain over that excluded amount. But I can't find "proof" of that. I've sent the client off to look for basis adjustments on that first house, but still need to be sure I have proper treatment of that deferred gain in my notes. Thanks. Was this question even coherent? I am _so_ tired I can barely see straight and have been typing with my eyes closed. Thanks all! Night-night. Catherine

Running one of those super-powerful rare earth magnets over the hard drive a few times and _then_ smashing it with a sledgehammer also works. ;)

.... you can shorten your statement to just the above, Jack, with no diminution of accuracy!

"There is _always_ a way, not too sickeningly false, to garner valuta." --Lazarus Long

ditto -- still hoping for some help!

just bumping this up in the queue...

Client has well over 300 stock transactions last year and broker won't give them in digital format, so I'm stuck with hand entry. That's OK, since I learned the form-unprotect trick, I'll be entering everything into excel and then doing a direct paste. However, lots of these "transactions" are wash sale disallowed loss lines. Should I enter them individually or can I net them against the the actual transaction? I'm not sure how ATX would treat individual lines, nor am I sure if netting them is less or more work than just plodding through doing entry by column and working my way down the lists. In the past, I've netted wash disallowed loss against the loss. But I've never had so many before; there are just _dozens_ of the things this year. Thanks. Catherine

Kea -- Why does anything in the partnership need changing? Did the partnership name change? That's what is associated with the EIN. If there wasn't enough ownership change to affect the partnership, I think your friend just takes over her mom's share, and the only thing that changes is the name and SSN on the K-1. For this year, there will be two for that share -- one for the mom, from 1/1/09 to DOD, then another from DOD thru EOY for daughter. Next year, that share will just have a single K-1 for your friend.

That's what I figured, but before I said "yes" definitely, thought it would be good to check. Thanks! They've added quite a bit to that info page since the last time I looked at it in early May (for someone else).

Clients of several years. Citizens of Canada who moved here some years ago. They bought a condo in Canada in which they lived while they were there. Turned it into rental property when they moved here in 2004. Sold the condo last year and paid capital gain as appropriate. Assuming they meet the income requirements, are they eligible for first-time homebuyer credit? They have not purchased a home in the US ever, nor have they purchased a home in which they lived, anywhere, in that same time frame. The change of the condo from residence to rental property was 4 - 5 years ago. I have my opinion, but would like to hear others. Thanks.

Do you mean a keyboard with integrated real-time printer?! :lol:

Thanks for the (somewhat frightening) laugh!

Can we _clone_ this guy?!?!?!

Or the fact that a very good friend of ours would be DEAD right now if he lived in Britain -- he had an aggressive form of kidney cancer. A type that, in the UK, the treatment is they pat you on the head and send you home to get your papers in order. Insurance didn't cover all his care -- but the family held fund-raisers, and, most importantly, HE IS ALIVE TODAY. If we get Obama care, you'd all better start growing your own medicinal herbs. We've seen this story, and it in the long run it doesn't end well. Ever.

I think it's terrific -- thanks, KC.

I got the email and responded -- there was an actual survey. Sometimes the oddball characters _in an email_ as due to ASCII character mismatch in the fonts used. Catherine

Hope you have a very :bday:

:bday: Hope you had a great day!

Sometimes the _best_ way to find the answer for yourself is to post a query. Then the item you've been hunting for leaps up off the page where it had been hiding, and you couldn't find it any of the last 14 times you read that very paragraph. Catherine :wub:

Thank you, KC, for a terrific morning chuckle!

:bday: and have a terrific day!

The Articles of Confederation were too loose and too close to anarchy -- the new country did not have enough central power to do crucial business successfully. The Constitution was meant to stay as close to anarchy as possible while still holding enough federal power to accomplish the essential items too large for individuals or individual states to accomplish. The founders had great reason to fear a strong central government -- they suck all power into themselves and, sooner or later, become tyrannies. They had just fought a long, nasty war to throw off the latest (in their time) iteration of this long pattern. They wanted people to be FREE to live their lives, without government jurisdiction of every move. The problem today is that, for close to a hundred years, BOTH major parties have moved us closer and closer to total government control of everything. I don't care whether you call it fascism, communism, dictatorship, absolute monarchy, oligarchy, or Uncle Sheldon. It's the same -- too much power in Washington, too little in the states, WAY too little leftover for the individual -- which is where MOST of it was intended to be held. Y'know, here in Massachusetts, there is LESS turnover of the state legislature than in the old USSR's Politburo. And we have the third in a row of former Speakers of the House under Federal indictment for criminal financial shenanigans. The rot goes very deep, and across the board, ALL the bums need to be thrown out of office. I was raised Democrat (in Massachusetts? like there's a choice?), am socially very liberal, and have become politically very conservative because I have had it ground into me, painfully, that government ruins all it touches (including, Jainen, the 'social programs" that have vastly INCREASED and FOSSILIZED poverty since they started in the 1960's), hurts those it professes to help -- and does it all at QUINTUPLE (at least!) the cost of the same projects done by private hands. I am conservative politically BECAUSE I am liberal socially -- I want the most good for the most people, and that means get it OUT of the government's filthy, power-mad claws.

I love it! The only quarrel I have is that the Republicans have been almost as bad for many years now.

Meant to post this earlier -- I was _very_ glad to hear that your biopsy came back fine. Congratulations on that, at least! And, for your amusement, a paraphrased quote from a book I read: "As long as one is breathing and the bowels move regularly, all other problems are but temporary and transient." Catherine