Jump to content
ATX Community

Lee B

Donors
  • Posts

    5,870
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    333

Everything posted by Lee B

  1. Enclosed in an NAEA email: Taxpayers facing fines for not having health insurance in 2014 will get another chance to sign up for benefits on the Obamacare exchanges this year, federal officials announced Friday. From March 15 through April 30, individuals who learn when they file tax returns that they must pay a penalty under the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate can return to HealthCare.gov to choose a plan for the current year, Andy Slavitt, the principal deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told reporters on a conference call. The three-month Obamacare sign-up campaign officially ended Sunday. But President Barack Obama's administration and some state authorities are reopening enrollment around tax time as a means of covering more uninsured people and mitigating the backlash from taxpayers who weren't covered last year and discover they owe fines starting at $95 per person when they file their 2014 returns
  2. Lynn, I took a quick look at their website and they have more features than I remembered. My biggest concern is my largest client , a small restaurant chain, 5 locations and over 60 employees. I will take an in depth look at Howell after tax season. Thanks, Lee
  3. I have seen this before, but it's been many years. It's for the personal use of a business auto.
  4. rfassett, Do you also use ATX as your tax software ? I am a bit surprised to see that you're using FAM, since there have been so many complaints the last several years on the ATX Board ?
  5. What or who is "CSA" ? I have been using Accounting Relief and Payroll Relief from Accountants World for almost 3 years now. After tax season ends, I want to replace these programs, so I am really interested in this topic. I have looked at both Howell and Medlin before and while they offer great value for the the price, there are a number of features that they lack, so they aren't an alternative for me.
  6. If you're asking about ATX, ATX's reasoning is they are not allowed to duplex state forms due to some state's rules ?
  7. The commissons from the store should have been on her W 2. Her employer is trying to avoid the employment taxes.
  8. Followup Post on ATX Board: Re: Big Problem - Assets Gone ATX reached out to me, but, unfortunately, no solution to the problem. And one is not expected any time soon! It's likely due to the fact that the Assets and the rest of the return are kept in separate files and, for some reason, the link between them may get broken. Form 4562 may still show the correct depreciation, but the assets are no longer there and, if you do not check it (after you close and re-open the return and e-file) your client may not receive the refund he was expecting! Moreover, even if that does not happen (because 4562 will, luckily, show the correct depreciation), by next year you may find that you need to re-input all assets and recompute the depreciation for all missing assets. And if you have clients with a dozen or more rental properties, you might have a really bad day.... So, I'd suggest you check and re-check all returns with assets in them. Good luck I have been using ATX for at least 15 years with fewer problems than most users. But, I am really concerned about this. This goes right to the integrity of the program. I hope I can get thru this tax season without any significant problems. I have looked at Drake 2 or 3 times before, but after this season I am definitely going to take a real serious look at Drake. Unless I run into some significant issues I would say I am about 90 % certain I will be leaving ATX after this tax season.
  9. What services does the AirBnB room come with ?
  10. I doublechecked some of my returns and they are all OK.
  11. Copied from the ATX Board: Big Problem - Assets Gone! After rolling over and/or entering new assets, I close the return to work on it later. When re-opening it, ALL assets have disappeared from the Asset Entry Worksheet! The computation and correct numbers still appear on the Schedules (E, C, 4562), but NO ASSETS linked to them. I noticed it almost by chance and decided to check on other returns I have already e-filed. The same problem happened with all of them! Assets gone! Is anybody having this problem? ATX, is there a solution Response: Re: Big Problem - Assets Gone! I called support and they were not able to solve the problem. The assets are actually there, though, and retrievable in a roundabout, time-consuming, unacceptable way. I don't want to have to do it for every return with depreciation. Moreover, after the procedure to retrieve the assets, the e-file does not synchronize! Anyhow, I was told that they are working on this glitch and will have a fix. Eventually... Let's hope it's before April 15
  12. Apparently it hasn't affected their revenue. Intuit announced today that Turbo Tax revenue has increased 19 % so far this season.
  13. Exactly, how the heck did he get his student loan debt cancelled. There are people in their 60 s starting to draw SS, ending up with their SS benefits garnished for old student loan debt.
  14. Lee B

    1099-C

    Yes, I had one several years ago. It was a small house that was being rented. It went thru with no questions.
  15. I will start in a few days.
  16. Clarification, if you are not a member there is a $ 20 Fee.
  17. I have restaurant clients. I have been using this description for over 20 years with no problems.
  18. For stock, the official holding period has to be more than one year, otherwise it's ordinary income property with deduction limited to basis.
  19. I like the title "Small Equipment"
  20. Lee B

    1099-C

    You will need to look at the closing statement for this loan, especially if it was a refi. They may have taken cash out or paid off credit cards etc which would not be qualified residence debt Thus part of the debt cancellation could still be taxable or have to be excluded for a different reason i.e. insolvency. It's not always as straightforward as it seems.
  21. More revised Repair Regs Guidance from Grant Thornton LLP via an email from NAEA: New federal tax developments from Grant Thornton’s Washington National Tax Office 2015-03 Feb. 16, 2015 IRS simplifies process for small businesses to implement tangible property regulations The IRS released a simplified procedure allowing certain small businesses to change a method of accounting under the final tangible property regulations on a prospective basis for the first taxable year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014, without completing and filing Form 3115, “Application for Change in Method of Accounting.” Rev. Proc. 2015-20 was released by the IRS on Feb. 13 and is effective immediately. A taxpayer is eligible to apply the simplified implementation procedures if it has one or more trades or businesses that have either: (a) Total assets of less than $10 million as of the first day of the taxable year for which a change in method of accounting under the final tangible property regulations and corresponding procedures regarding related changes in method of accounting is effective (b ) Average annual gross receipts of $10 million or less for the prior three taxable years, as determined under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.263(a)-3(h)(3) (the small taxpayer election for certain repairs and improvement expenditures for eligible buildings) The revenue procedure applies to a trade or business only if it meets one or both of the previous two criteria. Background The final tangible property regulations include both TD 9636, regarding when costs incurred to acquire, produce or improve tangible property must be capitalized or may be deducted, and TD 9689, regarding certain depreciation rules and full and partial dispositions of tangible depreciable property. (For more on the final tangible property regulations, see Tax Flash 2013-13 and Tax Flash 2014-10). The final tangible property regulations generally apply to taxable years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014, although certain provisions are applicable to costs incurred on or after taxable years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014. The previous procedures for implementing the final regulations were included in a series of revenue procedures (Rev. Proc. 2014-16, Rev. Proc. 2014-17 and Rev. Proc. 2014-54), which were recently modified by and consolidated into Rev. Proc. 2015-14. These procedures generally require that changes in methods of accounting to comply with the final tangible property regulations should be implemented using Section 481(a) to avoid duplication or omission (except for provisions applicable to costs incurred on or after taxable years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014). Section 481(a) requires a look-back adjustment computed as if the business had always used the new method of accounting. Additionally, the procedures require businesses that are changing a method of accounting to implement the final tangible property regulations to complete and file Form 3115. Simplified procedures Rev. Proc. 2015-20 effectively allows small businesses that make changes in methods of accounting for the first taxable year that begins on or after Jan. 1, 2014, to elect to make the changes prospectively by using a cut-off basis. Thus, small businesses that must change methods of accounting to comply with the new regulations can make a Section 481(a) adjustment that takes into account only amounts paid or incurred, and dispositions, in taxable years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014 (i.e., there is only a Section 481(a) adjustment computed back to 2014 when a change is made in a future year). The election must be applied to all of the final tangible property regulations, including dispositions. Accordingly, businesses are not allowed to apply certain rules, such as the treatment of repair expenditures, prospectively, and make disposition method changes with a Section 481(a) adjustment. Additionally, businesses making this election do not have audit protection. Businesses making the election to apply the final regulations prospectively have the option of making certain changes in method of accounting to comply with the regulations on the federal tax return without filing a Form 3115 or a separate statement for the business’s first taxable year ending on or after Jan. 1, 2014. Special transition rules apply for eligible businesses that already filed the federal tax return for the first taxable year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014. Implications and next steps This is truly welcome relief for small businesses that do not wish to take advantage of the cash tax savings opportunities in the regulations because of the increased burden and cost of implementation. Allowing small businesses to elect to apply the regulations prospectively and waive the requirement to file a Form 3115 greatly reduces their burden in implementing the regulations. Businesses taking advantage of the simplified procedures must still apply the new rules to their assets on their 2014 tax returns. This may require changes in the manner in which expenditures for certain assets are recovered, such as current expense, deferred materials and supplies expense, and depreciable assets. Additionally, taxpayers will need to determine whether to make certain elections, such as the de minimis rule, the small business election for repairs on eligible buildings or the election to follow book capitalization of repairs — all of which require an annual statement to be attached to the tax return. Similarly, taxpayers that do not track dispositions of certain assets (for example, personal property grouped as one asset in the fixed asset system) should continue to determine whether to make a general asset account election, which requires checking a box on Form 4562, “Depreciation and Amortization.” Taxpayers considering the less burdensome implementation rules should be aware that the simplification comes at the cost of the missed opportunity to accelerate deductions on certain costs capitalized in prior years. Taxpayers will not be able to file changes in future years to accelerate such basis from years prior to 2014. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not intended and should not be construed as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to or suitable for specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of nontax and other tax factors. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying or using any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from Grant Thornton LLP. Tax professional standards statement This document supports the marketing of professional services by Grant Thornton LLP. It is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. Persons interested in the subject of this document should contact Grant Thornton or their tax advisor to discuss the potential application of this subject matter to their particular facts and circumstances. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed. To the extent this document may be considered written tax advice, in accordance with applicable professional regulations, unless expressly stated otherwise, any written advice contained in, forwarded with, or attached to this document is not intended or written by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
  22. When you say history, I assume you mean each year's depreciation in detail rolling forward. Not available in ATX.
  23. Information a little sketchy, but assuming the normal scenario: Premiums deductible on the books, but nondeductible on the tax return. Thus the nondeductible premium expense is allocated to the partners K - 1 s When and if a policy pays off, Proceeds recorded on the books but nontaxable on the tax return.
  24. How did you generate a 20 k loss in 8 months ? I think you need to doublecheck your answers to setting up this property in Schedule E , due to the nonpassive result.
  25. Ouch that's just wrong
×
×
  • Create New...