Jack from Ohio

Seems to be working now.

I actually had a 1098-T with Box 1 filled in, and box 2 was empty!

You are putting on a three hour seminar this summer, right? Put the book in .pdf, buy some cheap flash drives and sell them there!!

Ditto TAXMAN & rfassett. This process has worked for me several times.

you can double click a variable to insert it into a letter.

I changed all my passwords to; "incorrect"

Is there another marker flag in the back 40?

ATX does show a red error for the states that REQUIRE the drivers license information. Ohio is one of those.

This is the perfect plan. Do 15 & 16 in July.

Call Tech Support

1. Yes, I would feel distespected. Your skills, abilities, experience and knowledge are not dependent upon the amount of liability insurance you choose to have. 2. Just say NO to giving them a copy. 3. Reconsider your choice about this person becoming a client. 4. He thinks he knows more about these things than you do. 5. RUN FORREST, RUN!!!

Call Tech Support

Circular 230 and other oversight regulations from the IRS, with associated big penalties for us.

If not QB, then Sage. If the person using it is truly accounting experienced. There are no "plug & play" accounting softwares.

Hahn 1040 is EXACTLY correct. H&R, in the example given, is wrong.

"Oh I understand, but my neighbor...."

3/20. NO EXCEPTIONS. Even those people that believe filing an extension guarantees an audit....

If they are expecting a 1065, and the election to be treated as an S-Corp has not been approved by the IRS, it will reject every time. Follow the steps to file the correct form.

Delete all the NY forms. Save the return. Close the return. Open the return. Add the forms. Make necessary inputs. Create e-file. Submit again. If you get the same rejection, paper file.

Audit and CP2000. Direct conversation with the auditor, and the person at the IRS assigned to the CP2000 fiasco. All three clients LOST, because of the lack of specificity in the divorce decree. I will stick with what I have experienced. Audit was in 2014. CP2000, one in 2015 & 2016. All it takes is for the recipient to not claim the income, or claim a different amount. The payer of alimony always loses.