Jump to content
ATX Community

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/21/2016 in all areas

  1. Long time business client didn't tell me she closed up shop in mid-Dec even when she dropped off her payroll records for the 4th quarter and year-end filings. Her records are a total mess and she always complained about something (I took too long, my fees are expensive, etc). She got a buh-bye letter this evening. I am relieved that I don't have to look at that mess any longer.
    6 points
  2. Michael: You got my attention with just the descriptions. I don't happen to owe you any money, do I?
    6 points
  3. "Wah Lum Kung Fu double broadswords" I had to google these, nice swords. here is my favorite pic
    5 points
  4. No you can't shoot them but many idiots don't know that. My office is full of 2nd amendment and NRA posters, a few of my martial art trophy's, a display of swords and Escrima sticks, etc. My receivables are -0-.
    5 points
  5. My new policy on simple returns is to tack on $50 for the first “it’s simple” and $25 for each subsequent “it’s simple,” up to three. Then it’s gonna be, “You’re right, this is really too simple a return for me to prepare as I specialize in difficult returns. Thanks for calling, but I can’t take this engagement.” "I should just do this myself," gets a punch in the stomach thru the phone.
    3 points
  6. My clients get paper copies in a nice folder (the ones Tenenz sells), plus a CD (a nickel a pop) with all their original doc's and all their tax doc's as pdf's, all of those password protected (as MA requires). CD tucks in to the back of the folder. Original paper docs go there, too, IF they fit - else the client has usually brought them in in their own folder (or something) and they go back the same way. In theory, they can chuck the all the paper and just keep the CD. They all keep the paper, though. I do go through the return with every client who comes in. With those who get sent packages by mail, I usually send a review copy of the most-crucial forms by the file portal for questions first. (That - for the most part - takes care of the "what about all my donations to Goodwill" questions where my answer is "WHAT donations to Goodwill" and saves lots of paper. And aggravation.) Also in the paper returns we highlight neither the refund nor the tax due, but rather the "total tax" line (which I call "the amount they get to keep"), since that is what I want people to take note of. This - plus the comparison page - also helps when the inevitable "why did I get more back last year" questions crop up.
    3 points
  7. I agree with Lion EA. I worked for HRB up until a year ago and there was very little preparers could do to change prices from what the software generated for individual returns and I often thought prices were too high for the work involved. However, there was more flexibility with others such as business returns and even amended and prior years' individual returns. So probably the preparer just put $1 into the billing program to get the return into the system as a paid return. I have even done that and charged 1¢ and it worked, resulting in what I considered a fair total price for the 2 returns!
    3 points
  8. Just picked up a 7 year old retread client. 2 W-2s and a 1098INT. Price increase over normal is happening. After tax year 2008, they have not communicated with me. Their info was in my drop box today. I don't know if their return fits the description of "simple?"
    3 points
  9. I review very few returns with the client. I am in communication with a good many of them all year long and we both have a good handle on how the return is going to look. For the rest, we have a check-in system whereby one of the girls ask the client a series of pertinent questions and then if anything looks strange during prep I get in touch with the client. I print the client copy and one of the girls check the client out going over highlights that I have made. If there are any further questions, I am called in to answer more technical questions. Having another member of the firm in the meeting allows me to get in and get out with very little time spent. This system is what allows me to prep over 500 returns during filing season - and still maintain what little bit of sanity I have left. We have been paperless (or less paper, more appropriately) since 2006 but continue to supply the client with a paper copy. We have two or three clients that like us to give them digital copies but we still give them a paper copy with the digital copy.
    3 points
  10. "it's a simple Return". Ok, what do we have? Bankruptcy Foreclosure New Schedule C for a Financial Advisor (after bankruptcy? Wow...) But I still have my same job and two kids... Sheesh. Rich
    3 points
  11. I print everything, client and preparer, to .pdf. I store the preparer copy digitally. From the pdf, I can use my printer's duplex function the way I want. I stopped printing paper copies for myself 5 years ago. I also give my clients the option of a flash drive. I have purchased a large number of 4GB flash drives for $4 each. I just copy the client pdf to the flash drive and give it back to the client. Most of my clients take advantage of this. Saves me a ton of time and paper. In addition, I can easily include the worksheets I want the client to see without making the "packet" I used to give them much larger.
    3 points
  12. THATS OVERTIME, MY FEE JUST 2X.
    3 points
  13. We can, can't we? Hey, Catherine, isn't there something in the second amendment about well-regulated militia and tax preparers and jerky wannabe clients?
    3 points
  14. Electrocution thru the phone.
    3 points
  15. OK. So what's the penalty for "You could probably do my return in your sleep." ??
    3 points
  16. Remind me to never, ever make you mad. You could be scary if ever crossed. Tom Newark, CA
    2 points
  17. I give the client paper returns. Review it with client. Some clients, very brief, usually just mention similarities to prior year, nothing in particular to point out. Unless there is something to point out. Some might ask some questions, etc.
    2 points
  18. Years ago when I was at Block, their proprietary software priced the individual returns for us and there was little we could do to lower the price. The few workarounds we had got fewer and fewer each year. But, the entity returns were done on ATX, and we entered in the price ourselves, supposedly from a price list HRB provided. So, if I wanted to give a client a discount who had both personal and business returns, I had to charge him full price for personal but could enter anything I wanted for the business return from $1 on up so it would show as paid before we transmitted. (Personally, I think a total of $380 for a partnership and personal return is too cheap.)
    2 points
  19. Quotes from the other topic that got me thinking about how I could change things:
    2 points
  20. I almost never review a return with the client. Very few ask for it. Some review it at home and call/email with questions. Some review it in the lobby and interrupt me if they have questions my office manager can't answer. I suspect that many never even open the envelope they pick up at the front desk. Most of my clients still get a paper copy but I only print out the 'highlights'.
    2 points
  21. Isn't it amazing that the same Lingo is a National Art? Thank you HRB and TurboTax commercials! And, Liberty will NOT do it for free. I do prepare returns for ACTIVE military pro bono.
    2 points
  22. No NRA posters in my office but beside the door to the inner office (mine) is a photo of me with my Wah Lum Kung Fu double broadswords. Maybe on the other side of the door I should put up a picture of myself on the line at the spring rifle league matches. @Margaret CPA in OH you remember holding my pretty purple rifle don't you?
    2 points
  23. When I was at HRB, they had us add $1 in interest to be able to e-file. Your software may have an override, or you may be able to get a code from tech support. But, I think it's an IRS e-file thing. I'd do the $1 and be done with it.
    2 points
  24. I hope that was over the phone, so you were able to resist the need to hit him?
    2 points
  25. Had one walk in off the street this week who had the return done last year by a local back porch preparer (translated low fee). Asked our fee. We prefaced the response with, it is going to be A LOT more than last year and then quote him a number. He says he would rather pay that and know that it is right. (I should mention that this guy was referred by an ex-client). Then this guy proceeds to ask if we give military discounts. I ask if he is in the military and he says no, but I was. Then he proceeds to mention that Liberty will do the return for free. I start for the door to open it so he does not break it when I kick him out but he stops me and says, I will pay whatever you charge me because you come highly recommended. This ought to be fun.
    2 points
  26. OK, I started this topic to continue a discuss about printing that one of my questions had the potential to derail. Highlights: I'm paperless but still review the paper returns with the clients from their client copy, then I get the e-file authorizations signed. Comments about providing client copies on flash drives was made and I asked how those review the returns with the clients, on a computer screen? I'd like to continue the discussion here, and I'd like to hear about others of you handle your meetings and finished products. I'd still like to review aspects of the return with the clients. I've mostly been using the 3-year comparison because it is a great summary of the return all on one page, and the clients seem to like that. I do show them the state return because many of my clients are older and are receiving benefits of DE's additional exclusions for those over 60 and 65.
    1 point
  27. Client has been bugging me for a couple days to send the K-1s for the trust from his mother's estate. He had emailed a document that according to him had' everything I needed.' That return finally made it to the top of my to-do stack. Turns out all he provided in the email attachment was the amount of each beneficiary's distribution. I told him I need the trust's income & expense info to prep the 1041. He told they don't care about the 1041 right now, I can do that later. All they want right now are the K-1s. Deep sigh. How quickly can April 18 get here?!?!?
    1 point
  28. My family will tell you that my temper is flash-in-the-pan. Something gets me royally ticked off, for ten seconds I yell at whatever thing has offended me (or some inanimate object for when the thing is a client or family member), it's done. Can't even remember it; don't hold grudges. I'm generally a happy person.
    1 point
  29. Now that is brilliant, what a great idea!!! My father, a farmer, always said, and I totally agree, "the slickest trick the government ever came up with was the withholding gimmick." When people focus on 'how much is my refund', they usually overlook the "the amount the government keeps", i.e. the amount they paid. The real dummies actually look at their 'refund' as a gift from Uncle Sam. Even those who owe tend to look at just the amount of the check they have to write, not the total tax bill.
    1 point
  30. This link is to a Concord MA Wah Lum school double broadswords photo - from their online gallery; not my school. The photo in my office is the same pose but from the other side so you can also see the lower, horizontal sword. Also I am wearing all black instead of exhibition red. Concord broadswords
    1 point
  31. I was trying to go to GuideStone yesterday before I posted it on this board, but their website was down for maintenance. I take their publications as gospel (pun intended) when it comes to minister tax issues. I will read these a bit later. Thanks Rita. Tom Newark, CA
    1 point
  32. Don't take it too hard; just a few years ago I was as lowly a PTIN as anybody you'll ever meet and only took the EA exam 'cause I was afraid RTRP would throw me out on the street. My squeaking through (studied months, said a prayer, gave a bum outside the test site ten bucks) brought to mind Groucho Marx's observation: "I wouldn't want to belong to any club that would be willing to have me for a member." Anyway, maybe give it a shot -- it's a great morale booster. However, as a practical matter, most people think you're either a CPA or you're not. Folks around here figure "EA" is some part of a declension of the verb "eat" (as in "I eat"/ "I et"/ "I done et") -- yeah, I'm kidding, but you get the gist of it. I wish IRS would call us "Special" Agent or something besides "Enrolled" which sounds like we're still in school. As to the EFIN issue, I subscribe to the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" school of thought (witness the problems other posters mention). IRS is liable to assign you two numbers and you maybe can't file with either one.
    1 point
  33. I agree with KC that the clients should contact the lawyer. Have them ask specifically if the judgement has been entered and the date of that entry. Snippets from KY adoption law: 199.515 Hearing -- Notice. 199.520 Judgment -- Prerequisites -- Orders -- Name and legal status of child -- Health history and other nonidentifying information of biological parents and relatives to be given to adoptive parents. (1) After hearing the case, the court shall enter a judgment of adoption, if it finds that the facts stated in the petition were established; that all legal requirements, including jurisdiction, relating to the adoption have been complied with; that the petitioners are of good moral character, of reputable standing in the community and of ability to properly maintain and educate the child; and that the best interest of the child will be promoted by the adoption and that the child is suitable for adoption. In the judgment, the name of the child shall be changed to conform with the prayer of the petition. The judgment and all orders required to be entered and recorded in the order book, including the caption, shall contain only the names of the petitioners and the proposed adopted name of the child, without any reference to its former name or the names of its birth parents. (2) Upon entry of the judgment of adoption, from and after the date of the filing of the petition, the child shall be deemed the child of petitioners and shall be considered for purposes of inheritance and succession and for all other legal considerations, the natural child of the parents adopting it the same as if born of their bodies. Upon granting an adoption, all legal relationship between the adopted child and the biological parents shall be terminated except the relationship of a biological parent who is the spouse of an adoptive parent. (3) The clerk of the court shall notify the cabinet of any action of the court with respect to entering a judgment granting an adoption, the amendment of an adoption, or the denial or dismissal of a petition for adoption.
    1 point
  34. Thanks Nellie and I did check the Schedule C to see if the active participation was checked and it is. Thanks again for your willingness to try and help. It is appreciated.
    1 point
  35. I have to agree with you. I guess I have confused my own thinking with the MFJ thing. While sometimes taxes and regulations don't make sense or applying common sense is a dangerous thing, the wording and check box entries would suggest just any other filing status could be used and doesn't negate the dependency. Heck I can't even get the adding machine to feed paper correctly so maybe I need to get away from ALL of this stuff for the day.
    1 point
  36. Filing a joint return for other than just a refund would negate the dependency for your client. But, granddaughter is not going to file MFJ. I think you're OK. Paper. Actually less of a problem if daddy filed claiming baby, as IRS will write to both of them but probably after sending refund.
    1 point
  37. Without being able to question the ladies, I agree with Terry. Except, granddaughter files MFS on paper. However, with a birth during 2015, there are bound to be lots of medical/insurance/medicaid forms around that might have baby daddy's SSN on them; if so, e-filing will work. You may discover that daddy claimed his baby. If so, parent trumps grandparent.
    1 point
  38. Hey, can't blame a guy for trying, right? LOL Think about him this way. Just be glad you got that out of the way up front. Much nicer than when they wait till you've done all the work, then start 'bargaining' over the fee. That's the kind that make you wish you could just shoot them.
    1 point
  39. https://www.facebook.com/171371406296691/videos/738072522959907/
    1 point
  40. 1 point
  41. To answer this particular question: Heck no, I wouldn't recommend that.
    1 point
  42. I agree. The fact is, the economics of solar vary, depending mainly on location, but it's a decision that should not be based on taxes.
    1 point
  43. I tell my clients "don't let the tax wag the dog". If it makes sense without the tax credit to install the panels, do it. If you want to "green" the planet because you don't like fossil fuels and you don't care about the economics, do it. If you want to use this as a way to save tax, I will run the numbers for you so you can make an intelligent tax decision. But please....please....PLEASE do not take tax advice from the salesmen. Tom Newark, CA
    1 point
  44. You nailed it there. I could not believe I had a lady in here worried about what she was going to make on the sale of a rental. I think she was actually trying to figure out if she should sell it for less because of taxes. I stopped her and said, "STOP thinking that way. Sell it for all you can. Taxes have ZERO to do with the decision about what to sell this house for." I thought her husband was going to cry he was so happy. "Yes. Thank you, OMG, thank you for telling her that."
    1 point
  45. Getting all the pages you want and just the pages you want is the hardest thing about ATX. You can tame the beast with Print Packets. It's a tedious process and the print packets don't have everything so you can only get it about 99%, but it makes it livable. edit: I forgot to mention customizing master forms. I check a ton of boxes on the master forms to print certain pages.
    1 point
  46. Thank you. Upon further review and the fact that it was his idea that I release him to go elsewhere and the blatant stupid and volume of the questions and strategies - he was most likely trying to drive me nuts on purpose. I gave him a copy of the return for review, I suspect the IRS will be getting a copy from him that looks exactly like it in a few days.
    1 point
  47. I reread your posts about this client, and from what you've posted here, you don't have anything to worry about. He may try to blame you, but his next victim preparer will figure him out soon enough. He may bad mouth you around your area, and this should be the worst of it. That will die down and people should see him for the complainer he is. Don't lose sleep over this guy because clients like him are nothing but a time suck to the detriment of your other existing clients or your ability to fill that time with other new, good ones. You'll be better off financially in the end because you won't have to answer his dozens of questions that he chooses to not want to understand anyway.
    1 point
  48. I love you, Jack, but I still think your position on this one is silly. It benefits not only the client and the preparer, it also benefits the IRS when we efile a return, and I do not consider it a lie at all, since everybody has normally had, over a year's time, some 'unreported income' of at least a dollar. Like the quarter I found on the ground next the the gas pump last time I filled up, the nickle I found in the change slot of the vending machine at the hospital last week, along with my own quarter in change, etc. And yes, there is a big difference in $1 and $100, because one makes no difference to the taxes and the other probably does. But I don't see it as any difference than the issue of amending a return for a late arriving 1099. The IRS says clearly that you should NOT file a 1040X that makes no change to the amount owed or refunded, unless it involves some other significant item. And when doing an audit, they will write up as a 'no-change' any audit where the changes they did find did not change the bottom line more than $50, where there are no other issues that might affect a past or future return.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...